Extendible endoprostheses have been available for more than 30
years and have become more sophisticated with time. The latest generation
is ‘non-invasive’ and can be lengthened with an external magnetic
force. Early results have shown a worryingly high rate of complications
such as infection. This study investigates the incidence of complications
and the need for further surgery in a cohort of patients with a
non-invasive growing endoprosthesis. Between 2003 and June 2014, 50 children (51 prostheses) had a
non-invasive growing prosthesis implanted for a primary bone sarcoma.
The minimum follow-up was 24 months for those who survived. Their
mean age was 10.4 years (6 to 14). The incidence of complications
and further surgery was documented.Aims
Patients and Methods
Type BI rotationplasty is currently indicated for children with tumours of the proximal femur whereas type BIIIa rotationplasty is reserved for those in which the entire femur has to be removed. Our aim was to compare these two types of rotationplasty and determine whether the knee should be preserved in children with tumours of the proximal femur. We compared the post-operative complications, oncological outcome, range of movement, Enneking score and radiographs of six children, who had undergone type BI rotationplasty with those of 12 who had undergone type BIIIa rotationplasty. Patients with type BI rotationplasty had a mean Enneking score of 21.6 compared with 24.4 in those with type BIIIa rotationplasty, and worse mean results in all of the parameters investigated. We conclude that type BI rotationplasty has a worse functional outcome and more complications than type BIIIa rotationplasty in children under the age of ten years.
