In cases of severe periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee, salvage procedures such as knee arthrodesis (KA) or above-knee amputation (AKA) must be considered. As both treatments result in limitations in quality of life (QoL), we aimed to compare outcomes and factors influencing complication rates, mortality, and mobility. Patients with PJI of the knee and subsequent KA or AKA between June 2011 and May 2021 were included. Demographic data, comorbidities, and patient history were analyzed. Functional outcomes and QoL were prospectively assessed in both groups with additional treatment-specific scores after AKA. Outcomes, complications, and mortality were evaluated.Aims
Methods
Haematomas, drainage, and other non-infectious
wound complications following total knee replacement (TKR) have
been associated with long-term sequelae, in particular, deep infection.
However, the impact of these wound complications on clinical outcome
is unknown. This study compares results in 15 patients re-admitted
for wound complications within 90 days of TKR to 30 matched patients
who underwent uncomplicated total knee replacements. Patients with
wound complications had a mean age of 66 years (49 to 83) and mean
body mass index (BMI) of 37 (21 to 54), both similar to that of
patients without complications (mean age 65 years and mean BMI 35). Those
with complications had lower mean Knee Society function scores (46
(0 to 100 vs 66 (20 to 100), p = 0.047) and a higher
incidence of mild or greater pain (73% vs 33%,
p = 0.01) after two years compared with the non re-admitted group.
Expectations in patients with wound complications following TKR
should be tempered, even in those who do not develop an
Worldwide rates of primary and revision total
knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rising due to increased longevity of
the population and the burden of osteoarthritis. Revision TKA is a technically demanding procedure generating
outcomes which are reported to be inferior to those of primary knee
arthroplasty, and with a higher risk of complication. Overall, the
rate of revision after primary arthroplasty is low, but the number
of patients currently living with a TKA suggests a large potential
revision healthcare burden. Many patients are now outliving their prosthesis, and consideration
must be given to how we are to provide the necessary capacity to
meet the rising demand for revision surgery and how to maximise
patient outcomes. The purpose of this review was to examine the epidemiology of,
and risk factors for, revision knee arthroplasty, and to discuss
factors that may enhance patient outcomes. Cite this article:
We compared the performance of uncemented trabecular metal tibial components in total knee replacement with that of cemented tibial components in patients younger than 60 years over two years using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). A total of 22 consecutive patients (mean age 53 years, 33 to 59, 26 knees) received an uncemented NexGen trabecular metal cruciate-retaining monobloc tibial component and 19 (mean 53 years, 44 to 59, 21 knees) a cemented NexGen Option cruciate-retaining modular tibial component. All the trabecular metal components migrated during the initial three months and then stabilised. The exception was external rotation, which did not stabilise until 12 months. Unlike conventional metal-backed implants which displayed a tilting migration comprising subsidence and lift-off from the tibial tray, most of the trabecular metal components showed subsidence only, probably due to the elasticity of the implant. This pattern of subsidence is regarded as being beneficial for uncemented fixation.
