The aim of this study was to compare the Push Ortho Thumb Brace
CMC and a custom-made orthosis in the treatment of patients with
primary osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb.
Our outcome measures were pain scores, tests of hand function, patient
satisfaction and patient preference. A multicentre crossover randomised controlled trial was conducted
which included 63 patients (44 women) with primary osteoarthritis
of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb. Of these, 59 patients
with a mean age of 60.1 years (standard deviation 8.2), completed
the study. Patients used both orthoses for two weeks with a two-week washout
period in-between. Pain was measured on a 10-cm visual analogue
scale. Hand function was assessed using the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function
test, Nine Hole Peg Test, key grip, pinch grip and Functional Index
for Hand Osteoarthritis. Patient preference was assessed using the
Dutch version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with
Assistive Technology score.Aims
Patients and Methods
Wrist block has been used to provide pain relief
for many procedures on the hand and wrist but its role in arthroscopy
of the wrist remains unexplored. Chondrotoxicity has been a concern
with the intra-articular infiltration of local anaesthetic. We aimed
to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of portal and wrist
joint infiltration with a wrist block on the pain experienced by
patients after arthroscopy of the wrist. A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial was designed and
patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist under general anaesthesia
as a day case were recruited for the study. Levo-bupivacaine was
used for both techniques. The effects were evaluated using a ten-point
visual analogue scale, and the use of analgesic agents was also
compared. The primary outcomes for statistical analyses were the
mean pain scores and the use of analgesia post-operatively. A total of 34 patients (63% females) were recruited to the portal
and joint infiltration group and 32 patients (59% males) to the
wrist block group. Mean age was 40.8 years in the first group and
39.7 years in the second group (p >
0.05). Both techniques provided
effective pain relief in the first hour and 24 hours post-operatively
but wrist block gave better pain scores at bedtime on the day of
surgery (p = 0.007) and at 24 hours post-operatively (p = 0.006). Wrist block provides better and more reliable analgesia in patients
undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist without exposing patients to
the risk of chondrotoxicity. Cite this article:
This article is a systematic review of the published
literature about the biomechanics, functional outcome and complications
of intramedullary nailing of fractures of the distal radius. We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases and included all
studies which reported the outcome of intramedullary (IM) nailing
of fractures of the distal radius. Data about functional outcome,
range of movement (ROM), strength and complications, were extracted.
The studies included were appraised independently by both authors
using a validated quality assessment scale for non-controlled studies
and the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The search strategy revealed 785 studies, of which 16 were included
for full paper review. These included three biomechanical studies,
eight case series and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The biomechanical studies concluded that IM nails were at least
as strong as locking plates. The clinical studies reported that
IM nailing gave a comparable ROM, functional outcome and grip strength
to other fixation techniques. However, the mean complication rate of intramedullary nailing
was 17.6% (0% to 50%). This is higher than the rates reported in
contemporary studies for volar plating. It raises concerns about
the role of intramedullary nailing, particularly when comparative
studies have failed to show that it has any major advantage over
other techniques. Further adequately powered RCTs comparing the
technique to both volar plating and percutaneous wire fixation are needed. Cite this article:
We conducted an anatomical study to determine
the best technique for transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN)
for the treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. The AIN, ulnar
nerve, and associated branches were dissected in 24 cadaver arms.
The number of branches of the AIN and length available for transfer
were measured. The nerve was divided just proximal to its termination
in pronator quadratus and transferred to the ulnar nerve through
the shortest available route. Separation of the deep and superficial
branches of the ulnar nerve by blunt dissection alone, was also
assessed. The mean number of AIN branches was 4.8 (3 to 8) and the
mean length of the nerve available for transfer was 72 mm (41 to
106). The transferred nerve reached the ulnar nerve most distally
when placed dorsal to flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). We therefore
conclude that the AIN should be passed dorsal to FDP, and that the
deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve require approximately
30 mm of blunt dissection and 20 mm of sharp dissection from the
point of bifurcation to the site of the anastomosis. The use of this technique for transfer of the AIN should improve
the outcome for patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Cite this article:
