We aimed to compare the implant survival, complications, readmissions, and mortality of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) treated with internal fixation with that of B1 PFFs treated with internal fixation and B2 fractures treated with revision arthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 112 PFFs, of which 47 (42%) B1 and 27 (24%) B2 PFFs were treated with internal fixation, whereas 38 (34%) B2 fractures underwent revision arthroplasty. Decision to perform internal fixation for B2 PFFs was based on specific radiological (polished femoral components, intact bone-cement interface) and clinical criteria (low-demand patient). Median follow-up was 36.4 months (24 to 60). Implant survival and mortality over time were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (measured with a modified Dindo-Clavien classification) and 90-day readmissions were additionally compared between groups.Aims
Methods
Most hip fractures treated with modern internal
fixation techniques will heal. However, failures occasionally occur and
require revision procedures. Salvage strategies employed during
revision are based on whether the fixation failure occurs in the
femoral neck, or in the intertrochanteric region. Patient age and
remaining bone stock also influence decision making. For fractures
in young patients, efforts are generally focused on preserving the
native femoral head via osteotomies and repeat internal fixation.
For failures in older patients, some kind of hip replacement is
usually selected. Disuse osteopenia, deformity, bone loss, and stress-risers
from previous internal fixation devices all pose technical challenges
to successful reconstruction. Attention to detail is important in
order to minimise complications. In the majority of cases, good
outcomes have been reported for the various salvage strategies. Cite this article:
