Conflicting clinical results are reported for the ATTUNE Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated five-year follow-up results comparing cemented ATTUNE and PFC-Sigma cruciate retaining TKAs, analyzing component migration as measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and radiological outcomes. A total of 74 primary TKAs were included in this single-blind RCT. RSA examinations were performed, and PROMs and clinical outcomes were collected immediate postoperatively, and at three, six, 12, 24, and 60 months’ follow-up. Radiolucent lines (RLLs) were measured in standard anteroposterior radiographs at six weeks, and 12 and 60 months postoperatively.Aims
Methods
A significant percentage of patients remain dissatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to determine whether the sequential addition of accelerometer-based navigation for femoral component preparation and sensor-guided ligament balancing improved complication rates, radiological alignment, or patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) compared with a historical control group using conventional instrumentation. This retrospective cohort study included 371 TKAs performed by a single surgeon sequentially. A historical control group, with the use of intramedullary guides for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided ligament balancing, was compared with a group using accelerometer-based navigation for distal femoral resection and surgeon-guided balancing (group 1), and one using navigated femoral resection and sensor-guided balancing (group 2). Primary outcome measures were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) scores measured preoperatively and at six weeks and 12 months postoperatively. The position of the components and the mechanical axis of the limb were measured postoperatively. The postoperative range of motion (ROM), haematocrit change, and complications were also recorded.Aims
Methods
The aim of this prospective randomised study was to compare the
time course of clinical improvement during the first two years following
a closing or opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). It was hypothesised
that there would be no differences in clinical outcome between the
two techniques. Between 2007 and 2013, 70 consecutive patients were randomly
allocated to undergo either a closing or opening wedge HTO. All
patients had medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), and were aged
between 30 years and 60 years. They were evaluated by independent
investigators pre-operatively and at three and six months, and one
and two years post-operatively using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis
Outcome Score (KOOS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Lysholm score,
the Tegner activity score, the University of California, Los Angeles
(UCLA) activity scale and range of movement (ROM).Aims
Patients and Methods
