Damage to the cartilage of the distal radioulnar
joint frequently leads to pain and limitation of movement, therefore repair
of this joint cartilage would be highly desirable. The purpose of
this study was to investigate the fixation of scaffold in cartilage
defects of this joint as part of matrix-assisted regenerative autologous
cartilage techniques. Two techniques of fixation of
The primary aim of this study was to assess if traumatic triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears can be treated successfully with immobilization alone. Our secondary aims were to identify clinical factors that may predict a poor prognosis. This was a retrospective analysis of 89 wrists in 88 patients between January 2015 and January 2019. All patients were managed conservatively initially with either a short-arm or above-elbow custom-moulded thermoplastic splint for six weeks. Outcome measures recorded included a visual analogue scale for pain, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and the modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS). Patients were considered to have had a poor outcome if their final MMWS was less than 80 points, or if they required eventual surgical intervention. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors for a poor outcome.Aims
Methods
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy
of collagenase clostridium histolyticum compared with fasciectomy
and percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) for Dupuytren’s disease. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science,
Cochrane, Teseo and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for clinical
trials and cohort or case-control studies which compared the clinical
outcomes and adverse effects of collagenase with those of fasciectomy
or PNF. Of 1345 articles retrieved, ten were selected. They described
the outcomes of 425 patients treated with collagenase and 418 treated
by fasciectomy or PNF. Complications were assessed using inverse-variance
weighted odds ratios (ORs). Clinical efficacy was assessed by differences
between the means for movement of the joint before and after treatment.
Dose adjustment was applied in all cases.Aims
Materials and Methods
