A consecutive series of 30 total hip replacements using a hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated, modular implant (Omnifit) was followed clinically and by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis for two years and compared with two control groups, one of 27 cemented Charnley sockets and one of 40 cemented Charnley stems. Omnifit sockets with a central gap between the dome of the socket and the acetabular bone in the postoperative radiographs, migrated less than sockets without such gaps (p = 0.01). After adjustment for patient-related factors (age, gender and weight), no significant difference was found between the two prostheses with respect to micromotion and wear. We conclude that the early fixation of the HA-coated Omnifit prosthesis compares with that of the cemented Charnley prosthesis

We describe the development and early clinical application of a ported, proximally-cemented titanium stem for cemented total hip arthroplasty. PMMA bone cement is delivered to the proximal femur under pressure after the stem has been positioned within the femoral canal. A mid-stem cement occluder contains the cement to the proximal stem only. A tapered body is incorporated in the design of the stem to reduce the structural stiffness and hence the degree of stress shielding within the reconstructed joint. We performed preclinical studies to measure the reduction in porosity and the pressurisation achieved. The porosity, as measured by the void percentage within the cured cement mantle, was reduced by more than 50% and there was an almost threefold increase in the mean pressure. Mechanical testing of the stem, using a three-point bend test, showed that the addition of cement injection ports on the anterior and posterior sides of the body of the proximal stem did not reduce its strength. Finite-element analysis indicated that, compared with a fully-cemented conventional stem, there was no change in the stresses within the cement mantle. In a series of 40 proximally-cemented stems followed for up to six years (mean 51 months) the mean Harris hip score was 91, and 85% of patients had good or excellent results. There was excellent pain relief, an increased level of activity and good patient satisfaction. One mechanical failure of the stem required revision at three years after implantation. The early results indicate that the clinical performance was equal to that achieved with other modern cemented stems. Radiological evaluation showed excellent results with no evidence of stress shielding. Further follow-up will determine if long-term stress shielding is reduced and if revision is made easier by the absence of a distal cement mantle

The aim of our study was to describe the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and normal inflammatory markers after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA).

In total 538 TKAs and 414 THAs underwent surgical treatment for PJI and met the inclusion criteria. Pre-operative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein level (CRP) were reviewed to identify the seronegative cohort. An age- and gender-matched cohort was identified from the remaining patients for comparison. Overall, 4% of confirmed infections were seronegative (21 TKA and 17 THA). Of those who underwent pre-operative aspiration, cultures were positive in 76% of TKAs (n = 13) and 64% of THAs (n = 7). Cell count and differential were suggestive of infection in 85% of TKA (n = 11) and all THA aspirates (n = 5). The most common organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Seronegative infections were associated with a lower aspirate cell count and a lower incidence of Staphylococcus aureus infection. Two-stage revision was performed in 35 cases (95%). At a mean of five years (14 to 162 months) following revision, re-operation for infection occurred in two TKAs, and one THA. From our study we estimate around 4% of patients with PJI may present with normal ESR and CRP. When performed, pre-operative aspirate is useful in delivering a definitive diagnosis. When treated, similar outcomes can be obtained compared with patients with positive serology.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:939–44.