Between 1995 and 2006, five intra-articular osteotomies of the head of the radius were performed in patients with symptomatic healed displaced articular fractures. Pre-operatively, all patients complained of persistent painful clicking on movement. Only patients with mild or no degenerative changes of the radial head and
Excision is not a suitable treatment for all comminuted fractures of the radial head. In elbows where instability can be predicted, a replacement arthroplasty of the radial head is more effective. The aim of this paper was to present the medium-term results of the Judet floating radial head prosthesis. This operation was performed on 14 patients between 1992 and 2003, of whom 12 were reviewed at a mean follow-up of five years and three months (1 to 12 years). The outcome was assessed using the Mayo elbow performance score and a modified Disability of Arm Shoulder Hand (DASH) questionnaire. There were six excellent results, four good, one fair and one poor, as graded by the Mayo score. The mean DASH score was 23.9/100 (0 to 65.8/100). The only significant complication occurred in one patient who developed a severe complex regional pain syndrome. There were no patients with secondary instability of the elbow, implant loosening, cubitus valgus, osteoporosis of the
We analysed the axis of movement in the normal elbow during flexion in vivo using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). The results show an intraindividual variation in the inclination of the axis ranging from 2.1° to 14.3° in the frontal and from 1.6° to 9.8° in the horizontal plane analysed at 30° increments. The inclination of the mean axis of rotation varied within a range of 12.7° in the frontal and 4.6° in the horizontal plane. In both planes, the mean axes were located close to a line joining the centres of the trochlea and
The zona conoidea comprises the area of the lateral
trochlear ridge of the humerus. The purpose of this study is to reintroduce
this term ‘zona conoidea’ to the discussion of the human elbow and
to investigate its significance in the development of osteoarthritis
of the elbow. The upper extremities of 12 cadavers were prepared. With the
forearm in neutral, pronation and supination, the distance between
the bevel of the radial head and zona conoidea was inspected. A
total of 12 healthy volunteers had a CT scan. The distance between
the zona conoidea and the bevelled rim of the radial head was measured
in these positions. In the anatomical specimens, early osteo-arthritic changes were
identified in the posteromedial bevelled rim of the radial head,
and the corresponding zona conoidea in supination. Measurement in
the CT study showed that in full supination, the distance between
the bevel of the radial head and the zona conoidea was at a minimum. This study suggests that the significant contact between the
bevel of the radial head and the zona conoidea in supination is
associated with the initiation of osteoarthritis of the elbow in
this area.
There is little information available at present regarding the mechanisms of failure of modern metallic radial head implants. Between 1998 and 2008, 44 consecutive patients (47 elbows) underwent removal of a failed metallic radial head replacement. In 13 patients (13 elbows) the initial operation had been undertaken within one week of a fracture of the radial head, at one to six weeks in seven patients (seven elbows) and more than six weeks (mean of 2.5 years (2 to 65 months)) in 22 patients (25 elbows). In the remaining two elbows the replacement was inserted for non-traumatic reasons. The most common indication for further surgery was painful loosening (31 elbows). Revision was undertaken for stiffness in 18 elbows, instability in nine, and deep infection in two. There were signs of over-lengthening of the radius in 11 elbows. Degenerative changes were found in all but one. Only three loose implants had been fixed with cement. Instability was not identified in any of the bipolar implants.
Surgical access to the head of the radius is usually performed through a lateral approach. We present an alternative technique through a modified posterior approach which was developed following dissections of 22 human cadavers. An osteotomy of the supinator tuberosity was performed and reflected as a single unit with the attached annular ligament. Excellent exposure of the head of the radius was achieved, replacement of the head was undertaken and the osteotomy site repaired. The elbows were stable and had a full range of movement. The approach was then carried out on 13 patients for elective replacement of the head and was found to be safe and reproducible. In the patient group all osteotomies united, the elbows were stable and had an improved range of supination and pronation. There was no change in flexion and extension of the elbow. Complications included a haematoma and a reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The modified posterior approach provides excellent access to the head and neck of the radius, gives good stability of the elbow and allows early mobilisation of the joint.
The use of passive stretching of the elbow after
arthrolysis is controversial. We report the results of open arthrolysis in
81 patients. Prospectively collected outcome data with a minimum
follow-up of one year were analysed. All patients had sustained
an intra-articular fracture initially and all procedures were performed
by the same surgeon under continuous brachial plexus block anaesthesia
and with continuous passive movement (CPM) used post-operatively
for two to three days. CPM was used to maintain the movement achieved
during surgery and passive stretching was not used at any time.
A senior physiotherapist assessed all the patients at regular intervals.
The mean range of movement (ROM) improved from 69° to 109° and the
function and pain of the upper limb improved from 32 to 16 and from
20 to 10, as assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and
Hand score and a visual analogue scale, respectively. The greatest
improvement was obtained in the stiffest elbows: nine patients with
a pre-operative ROM <
30° achieved a mean post-operative ROM
of 92° (55° to 125°). This study demonstrates that in patients with
a stiff elbow after injury, good results may be obtained after open
elbow arthrolysis without using passive stretching during rehabilitation.
We undertook this study to determine the minimum
amount of coronoid necessary to stabilise an otherwise intact elbow
joint. Regan–Morrey types II and III, plus medial and lateral oblique
coronoid fractures, collectively termed type IV fractures, were
simulated in nine fresh cadavers. An electromagnetic tracking system
defined the three-dimensional stability of the ulna relative to
the humerus. The coronoid surface area accounts for 59% of the anterior articulation.
Alteration in valgus, internal and external rotation occurred only
with a type III coronoid fracture, accounting for 68% of the coronoid
and 40% of the entire articular surface. A type II fracture removed
42% of the coronoid articulation and 25% of the entire articular
surface but was associated with valgus and external rotational changes
only when the radial head was removed, thereby removing 67% of the
articular surface. We conclude that all type III fractures, as defined here, are
unstable, even with intact ligaments and a radial head. However,
a type II deficiency is stable unless the radial head is removed.
Our study suggests that isolated medial-oblique or lateral-oblique
fractures, and even a type II fracture with intact ligaments and
a functional radial head, can be clinically stable, which is consistent
with clinical observation.
In light of the growing number of elderly osteopenic
patients with distal humeral fractures, we discuss the history of
their management and current trends. Under most circumstances operative
fixation and early mobilisation is the treatment of choice, as it
gives the best results. The relative indications for and results
of total elbow replacement
Arthrolysis and dynamic splinting have been used in the treatment of elbow contractures, but there is no standardised protocol for treatment of severe contractures with an arc of flexion <
30°. We present our results of radical arthrolysis with twin incisions with the use of a monolateral hinged fixator to treat very severe extra-articular contracture of the elbow. This retrospective study included 26 patients (15 males and 11 females) with a mean age of 30 years (12 to 60). The mean duration of stiffness was 9.1 months (5.4 to 18) with mean follow-up of 5.2 years (3.5 to 9.4). The mean pre-operative arc of movement was 15.6° (0° to 30°), with mean pre-operative flexion of 64.1° (30° to 120°) and mean pre-operative extension of 52.1° (10° to 90°). Post-operatively the mean arc improved to 102.4° (60° to 135°), the mean flexion improved to 119.1° (90° to 140°) and mean extension improved to 16.8° (0° to 30°) (p <
0.001). The Mayo elbow score improved from a mean of 45 (30 to 65) to 89 (75 to 100) points, and 13 had excellent, nine had good, three had fair and one had a poor result. We had one case of severe instability and one wound dehiscence which responded well to treatment. One case had deep infection with poor results which responded well to treatment. Our findings indicate that this method is very effective in the treatment of severe elbow contracture; however, a randomised controlled study is necessary for further evaluation.
Sixteen patients who underwent a revision operation for nonunion of fractures of the distal humerus following previous internal fixation were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 39 months (8 to 69). The Mayo elbow performance score was excellent in 11, good in two, fair in two and poor in one. In 15 patients union was achieved and in one with an infected nonunion a subsequent bone graft was necessary in order to obtain union. Age, gender, a history of smoking, mechanism of the injury and the AO classification of the initial fracture did not correlate with the development of nonunion. In 12 patients (75%), the initial fixation was assessed as being suboptimal. The primary surgery was regarded as adequate in only three patients. Our findings suggest that the most important determinant of nonunion of a distal humeral fracture after surgery is the adequacy of fixation.
We describe the intermediate results of lateral ligamentous repair or reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. Between 1986 and 1999, we performed 12 direct repairs and 33 ligament reconstructions with a tendon autograft. One patient was lost to follow-up and 44 were retrospectively studied at a mean of six years (2 to 15). Surgery restored stability in all except five patients. In two the elbow became stable after a second procedure. The mean post-operative Mayo elbow performance score was 85 points (60 to 100). The result was classified as excellent in 19, good in 13, fair in seven and poor in five patients. Thirty-eight patients (86%) were subjectively satisfied with the outcome of the operation. Better results were obtained in patients with a post-traumatic aetiology (p = 0.03), those with subjective symptoms of instability at presentation (p = 0.006) and those who had an augmented reconstruction using a tendon graft (p = 0.04). Reconstruction using a tendon graft seems to provide better results than ligament repair and the results do not seem to deteriorate with time. The outcome of this procedure is less predictable in patients with no subjective instability.