In patients with traumatic brain injury and fractures
of long bones, it is often clinically observed that the rate of bone
healing and extent of callus formation are increased. However, the
evidence has been unconvincing and an association between such an
injury and enhanced fracture healing remains unclear. We performed
a retrospective cohort study of 74 young adult patients with a mean
age of 24.2 years (16 to 40) who sustained a femoral shaft fracture
(AO/OTA type 32A or 32B) with or without a brain injury. All the
fractures were treated with closed intramedullary nailing. The main
outcome measures included the time required for bridging callus
formation (BCF) and the mean callus thickness (MCT) at the final
follow-up. Comparative analyses were made between the 20 patients
with a brain injury and the 54 without brain injury. Subgroup comparisons
were performed among the patients with a brain injury in terms of
the severity of head injury, the types of intracranial haemorrhage
and gender. Patients with a brain injury had an earlier appearance
of BCF
(p <
0.001) and a greater final MCT value (p <
0.001) than
those without. There were no significant differences with respect
to the time required for BCF and final MCT values in terms of the
severity of head injury (p = 0.521 and p = 0.153, respectively),
the types of intracranial haemorrhage (p = 0.308 and p = 0.189,
respectively) and gender (p = 0.383 and
p = 0.662, respectively). These results confirm that an injury to the
Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication after elbow trauma and can cause severe upper limb disability. Although multiple prognostic factors have been reported to be associated with the development of post-traumatic HO, no model has yet been able to combine these predictors more succinctly to convey prognostic information and medical measures to patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify prognostic factors leading to the formation of HO after surgery for elbow trauma, and to establish and validate a nomogram to predict the probability of HO formation in such particular injuries. This multicentre case-control study comprised 200 patients with post-traumatic elbow HO and 229 patients who had elbow trauma but without HO formation between July 2019 and December 2020. Features possibly associated with HO formation were obtained. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used to optimize feature selection. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to build the new nomogram: the Shanghai post-Traumatic Elbow Heterotopic Ossification Prediction model (STEHOP). STEHOP was validated by concordance index (C-index) and calibration plot. Internal validation was conducted using bootstrapping validation.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to assess whether it is possible to predict the mortality, and the extent and time of neurological recovery from the time of the onset of symptoms and MRI grade, in patients with the cerebral fat embolism syndrome (CFES). This has not previously been investigated. The study included 34 patients who were diagnosed with CFES following trauma between 2012 and 2018. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed and the severity graded by MRI. We investigated the rate of mortality, the time and extent of neurological recovery, the time between the injury and the onset of symptoms, the clinical severity of the condition, and the MRI grade. All patients were male with a mean age of 29.7 years (18 to 70). The mean follow-up was 4.15 years (2 to 8), with neurological recovery being assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination.Aims
Methods
Exsanguination is the second most common cause
of death in patients who suffer severe trauma. The management of
haemodynamically unstable high-energy pelvic injuries remains controversial,
as there are no universally accepted guidelines to direct surgeons
on the ideal use of pelvic packing or early angio-embolisation.
Additionally, the optimal resuscitation strategy, which prevents
or halts the progression of the trauma-induced coagulopathy, remains
unknown. Although early and aggressive use of blood products in
these patients appears to improve survival, over-enthusiastic resuscitative
measures may not be the safest strategy. This paper provides an overview of the classification of pelvic
injuries and the current evidence on best-practice management of
high-energy pelvic fractures, including resuscitation, transfusion
of blood components, monitoring of coagulopathy, and procedural
interventions including pre-peritoneal pelvic packing, external
fixation and angiographic embolisation. Cite this article:
We describe 261 peripheral nerve injuries sustained
in war by 100 consecutive service men and women injured in Iraq
and Afghanistan. Their mean age was 26.5 years (18.1 to 42.6), the
median interval between injury and first review was 4.2 months (mean
8.4 months (0.36 to 48.49)) and median follow-up was 28.4 months
(mean 20.5 months (1.3 to 64.2)). The nerve lesions were predominantly
focal prolonged conduction block/neurapraxia in 116 (45%), axonotmesis
in 92 (35%) and neurotmesis in 53 (20%) and were evenly distributed
between the upper and the lower limbs. Explosions accounted for
164 (63%): 213 (82%) nerve injuries were associated with open wounds.
Two or more main nerves were injured in 70 patients. The ulnar,
common peroneal and tibial nerves were most commonly injured. In
69 patients there was a vascular injury, fracture, or both at the
level of the nerve lesion. Major tissue loss was present in 50 patients:
amputation of at least one limb was needed in 18. A total of 36 patients
continued in severe neuropathic pain. This paper outlines the methods used in the assessment of these
injuries and provides information about the depth and distribution
of the nerve lesions, their associated injuries and neuropathic
pain syndromes.
There have been many advances in the resuscitation
and early management of patients with severe injuries during the
last decade. These have come about as a result of the reorganisation
of civilian trauma services in countries such as Germany, Australia
and the United States, where the development of trauma systems has
allowed a concentration of expertise and research. The continuing
conflicts in the Middle East have also generated a significant increase
in expertise in the management of severe injuries, and soldiers
now survive injuries that would have been fatal in previous wars.
This military experience is being translated into civilian practice. The aim of this paper is to give orthopaedic surgeons a practical,
evidence-based guide to the current management of patients with
severe, multiple injuries. It must be emphasised that this depends
upon the expertise, experience and facilities available within the
local health-care system, and that the proposed guidelines will
inevitably have to be adapted to suit the local resources.