The aim of this study was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of recovery for use in patients who have suffered an open tibial fracture. An initial pool of 109 items was generated from previous qualitative data relating to recovery following an open tibial fracture. These items were field tested in a cohort of patients recovering from an open tibial fracture. They were asked to comment on the content of the items and structure of the scale. Reduction in the number of items led to a refined scale tested in a larger cohort of patients. Principal components analysis permitted further reduction and the development of a definitive scale. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness were assessed for the retained items.Aims
Methods
The open blast fracture of the pelvis is considered
to be the most severe injury within the spectrum of battlefield trauma.
We report our experience of 29 consecutive patients who had sustained
this injury in Afghanistan between 2008 and 2010. Their median new
injury severity score (NISS) was 41 (8 to 75), and mean blood requirement
in the first 24 hours was 60.3 units (0 to 224). In addition to
their orthopaedic injury, six had an associated vascular injury, seven
had a bowel injury, 11 had a genital injury and seven had a bladder
injury. In all, eight fractures were managed definitively with external
fixation and seven required internal fixation. Of those patients
who underwent internal fixation, four required removal of metalwork
for infection. Faecal diversion was performed in nine cases. The
median length of hospital stay following emergency repatriation
to the United Kingdom was 70.5 days (5 to 357) and the mean total
operating time was 29.6 hours (5 to 187). At a mean follow-up of
20.3 months (13.2 to 29.9), 24 patients (82.8%) were able to walk
and 26 (89.7%) had clinical and radiological evidence of stability
of the pelvic ring. As a result of the increase in terrorism, injuries that were
previously confined exclusively to warfare can now occur anywhere,
with civilian surgeons who are involved in trauma care potentially
required to manage similar injuries. Our study demonstrates that
the management of this injury pattern demands huge resources and significant
multidisciplinary input. Given the nature of the soft-tissue injury,
we would advocate external fixation as the preferred management
of these fractures. With the advent of emerging wound and faecal
management techniques, we do not believe that faecal diversion is
necessary in all cases.
