The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in functional outcome after repair and non-repair of the pronator quadratus muscle in patients undergoing surgical treatment for a distal radial fracture with volar plating. A total of 72 patients with a distal radial fracture were included in this randomized clinical trial. They were allocated to have the pronator quadratus muscle repaired or not, after volar locked plating of a distal radial fracture. The patients, the assessor, the primary investigator, and the statistician were blinded to the allocation. Randomization was irreversibly performed using a web application that guaranteed a secure and tamper-free assignment. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) after 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, pronation strength, grip strength, the range of pronation and supination, complications, and the operating time.Aims
Patients and Methods
We compared the ceiling effects of two patient-rating
scores, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), and a physician-rating score,
the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) in assessing the outcome of
surgical treatment of an unstable distal radial fracture. A total
of 77 women with a mean age of 64.2 years (50 to 88) who underwent
fixation using a volar locking plate for an unstable distal radial fracture
between 2011 and 2013 were enrolled in this study. All completed
the DASH and PRWE questionnaires one year post-operatively and were
assessed using the MMWS by the senior author. The ceiling effects
in the outcome data assessed for each score were estimated. The data assessed with both patient-rating scores, the DASH and
PRWE, showed substantial ceiling effects, whereas the data assessed
with MMWS showed no ceiling effect. Researchers should be aware of a possible ceiling effect in the
assessment of the outcome of the surgical treatment of distal radial
fractures using patient-rating scores. It could also increase the
likelihood of a type II error. Cite this article:
