The surgical target for optimal implant positioning in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty remains the subject of ongoing discussion. One of the proposed targets is to recreate the knee’s functional behaviour as per its pre-diseased state. The aim of this study was to optimize implant positioning, starting from mechanical alignment (MA), toward restoring the pre-diseased status, including ligament strain and kinematic patterns, in a patient population. We used an active appearance model-based approach to segment the preoperative CT of 21 osteoarthritic patients, which identified the osteophyte-free surfaces and estimated cartilage from the segmented bones; these geometries were used to construct patient-specific musculoskeletal models of the pre-diseased knee. Subsequently, implantations were simulated using the MA method, and a previously developed optimization technique was employed to find the optimal implant position that minimized the root mean square deviation between pre-diseased and postoperative ligament strains and kinematics.Aims
Methods
Recent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs have featured more anatomical morphologies and shorter tibial keels. However, several reports have raised concerns about the impact of these modifications on implant longevity. The aim of this study was to report the early performance of a modern, cemented TKA design. All patients who received a primary, cemented TKA between 2012 and 2017 with a minimum two-year follow-up were included. The implant investigated features an asymmetrical tibial baseplate and shortened keel. Patient demographic details, Knee Society Scores (KSS), component alignment, and the presence of radiolucent lines at final follow-up were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate survivorship.Aims
Methods
Stems improve the mechanical stability of tibial
components in total knee replacement (TKR), but come at a cost of stress
shielding along their length. Their advantages include resistance
to shear, reduced tibial lift-off and increased stability by reducing
micromotion. Longer stems may have disadvantages including stress
shielding along the length of the stem with associated reduction
in bone density and a theoretical risk of subsidence and loosening, peri-prosthetic
fracture and end-of-stem pain. These features make long stems unattractive
in the primary TKR setting, but often desirable in revision surgery
with bone loss and instability. In the revision scenario, stems
are beneficial in order to convey structural stability to the construct
and protect the reconstruction of bony defects. Cemented and uncemented
long stemmed implants have different roles depending on the nature
of the bone loss involved. This review discusses the biomechanics of the design of tibial
components and stems to inform the selection of the component and
the technique of implantation.
We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive
series of 178 Mobility total ankle replacements (TARs) performed
by three surgeons between January 2004 and June 2009, and analysed
radiological parameters and clinical outcomes in a subgroup of 129
patients. The mean follow-up was 4 years (2 to 6.3). A total of
ten revision procedures (5.6%) were undertaken. The mean Ankle Osteoarthritis
Scale (AOS) pain score was 17 (0 to 88) and 86% of patients were
clinically improved at follow-up. However, 18 patients (18 TARs,
14%) had a poor outcome with an AOS pain score of >
30. A worse
outcome was associated with a pre-operative diagnosis of post-traumatic degenerative
arthritis. However, no pre- or post-operative radiological parameters
were significantly associated with a poor outcome. Of the patients
with persistent pain, eight had predominantly medial-sided pain.
Thirty TARs (29%) had a radiolucency in at least one zone. The outcome of the Mobility TAR at a mean of four years is satisfactory
in >
85% of patients. However, there is a significant incidence
of persistent pain, particularly on the medial side, for which we
were unable to establish a cause. Cite this article:
