Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all TKAs. Although the complexity of these procedures is well recognized, few investigators have evaluated the cost and value-added with the implementation of a dedicated revision arthroplasty service. The aim of the present study is to compare and contrast surgeon productivity in several differing models of activity. All patients that underwent primary or revision TKA from January 2016 to June 2018 were included as the primary source of data. All rTKA patients were categorized by the number of components revised (e.g. liner exchange, two or more components). Three models were used to assess the potential surgical productivity of a dedicated rTKA service : 1) work relative value unit (RVU) Aims
Materials and Methods
Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented
to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia;
2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular
pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits
to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial
etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical
problem.
