There is no diagnostic, non-invasive method for the early detection of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. In a pilot study, we have analysed two serum markers of bone remodelling, procollagen I C-terminal extension peptide (PICP) and cross-linked N-terminal telopeptide (NTx), as well as the diagnostic performance of NTx for the assessment of osteolysis. We recruited 21 patients with loosening (group I), 18 with a well-fixed prosthesis (group II) and 17 at the time of primary arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (OA) (group III). Internal normal reference ranges were obtained from 30 healthy subjects (group IV).

The serum PICP level was found to be significantly lower in patients with OA and those with loosening, when compared with those with stable implants, while the NTx level was significantly increased only in the group with loosening, suggesting that collagen degradation depended on the altered bone turnover induced by the implant. This hypothesis was reinforced by the finding that the values in the pre-surgery patients and stable subjects were comparable with the reference range of younger healthy subjects.

A high specificity and positive predictive value for NTx provided good diagnostic evidence of agreement between the test and the clinical and radiological evaluations. The NTx level could be used to indicate stability of the implant. However, further prospective, larger studies are necessary.

The effect of zoledronic acid on bone ingrowth was examined in an animal model in which porous tantalum implants were placed bilaterally within the ulnae of seven dogs. Zoledronic acid in saline was administered via a single post-operative intravenous injection at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg. The ulnae were harvested six weeks after surgery. Undecalcified transverse histological sections of the implant-bone interfaces were imaged with backscattered scanning electron microscopy and the percentage of available pore space that was filled with new bone was calculated. The mean extent of bone ingrowth was 6.6% for the control implants and 12.2% for the zoledronic acid-treated implants, an absolute difference of 5.6% (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 10.1) and a relative difference of 85% which was statistically significant. Individual islands of new bone formation within the implant pores were similar in number in both groups but were 69% larger in the zoledronic acid-treated group. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid should be further investigated for use in accelerating or enhancing the biological fixation of implants to bone.