The aim of this study was to describe the management and associated outcomes of patients sustaining a femoral hip periprosthetic fracture (PPF) in the UK population. This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study including adult patients who presented to 27 NHS hospitals with 539 new PPFs between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Data collected included: management strategy (operative and nonoperative), length of stay, discharge destination, and details of post-treatment outcomes (reoperation, readmission, and 30-day and 12-month mortality). Descriptive analysis by fracture type was performed, and predictors of PPF management and outcomes were assessed using mixed-effects logistic regression.Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty
(THA) are devastating complications that are associated with functional
limitations and increased overall mortality. Although cementless
implants have been associated with an increased risk of PFF, the
precise contribution of implant geometry and design on the risk
of both intra-operative and post-operative PFF remains poorly investigated.
A systematic review was performed to aggregate all of the PFF literature
with specific attention to the femoral implant used. A systematic search strategy of several journal databases and
recent proceedings from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
was performed. Clinical articles were included for analysis if sufficient
implant description was provided. All articles were reviewed by
two reviewers. A review of fundamental investigations of implant
load-to-failure was performed, with the intent of identifying similar
conclusions from the clinical and fundamental literature.Aims
Patients and Methods
The National Institute for Health and Clinical
Excellence (NICE) guidelines from 2011 recommend the use of cemented
hemi-arthroplasty for appropriate patients with an intracapsular
hip fracture. In our institution all patients who were admitted
with an intracapsular hip fracture and were suitable for a hemi-arthroplasty
between April 2010 and July 2012 received an uncemented prosthesis
according to our established departmental routine practice. A retrospective
analysis of outcome was performed to establish whether the continued
use of an uncemented stem was justified. Patient, surgical and outcome
data were collected on the National Hip Fracture database. A total
of 306 patients received a Cathcart modular head on a Corail uncemented
stem as a hemi-arthroplasty. The mean age of the patients was 83.3
years ( Cite this article:
Using data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register,
8639 cemented and 2477 uncemented primary hemiarthroplasties for
displaced fractures of the femoral neck in patients aged > 70 years
were included in a prospective observational study. A total of 218
re-operations were performed after cemented and 128 after uncemented
procedures. Survival of the hemiarthroplasties was calculated using
the Kaplan-Meier method and hazard rate ratios (HRR) for revision
were calculated using Cox regression analyses. At five years the
implant survival was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97 to 97)
for cemented and 91% (95% CI 87 to 94) for uncemented hemiarthroplasties.
Uncemented hemiarthroplasties had a 2.1 times increased risk of
revision compared with cemented prostheses (95% confidence interval
1.7 to 2.6, p < 0.001). The increased risk was mainly caused
by revisions for peri-prosthetic fracture (HRR = 17), aseptic loosening
(HRR = 17), haematoma formation (HRR = 5.3), superficial infection
(HRR = 4.6) and dislocation (HRR = 1.8). More intra-operative complications,
including intra-operative death, were reported for the cemented
hemiarthroplasties. However, in a time-dependent analysis, the HRR
for re-operation in both groups increased as follow-up increased. This study showed that the risk for revision was higher for uncemented
than for cemented hemiarthroplasties.
