Bone defects are frequently observed in anterior shoulder instability. Over the last decade, knowledge of the association of bone loss with increased failure rates of soft-tissue repair has shifted the surgical management of chronic shoulder instability. On the glenoid side, there is no controversy about the critical glenoid bone loss being 20%. However, poor outcomes have been described even with a subcritical glenoid bone defect as low as 13.5%. On the humeral side, the Hill-Sachs lesion should be evaluated concomitantly with the glenoid defect as the two sides of the same bipolar lesion which interact in the instability process, as described by the glenoid track concept. We advocate adding remplissage to every Bankart repair in patients with a Hill-Sachs lesion, regardless of the glenoid bone loss. When critical or subcritical glenoid bone loss occurs in active patients (> 15%) or bipolar off-track lesions, we should consider anterior glenoid bone reconstructions. The techniques have evolved significantly over the last two decades, moving from open procedures to arthroscopic, and from screw fixation to metal-free fixation. The new arthroscopic techniques of glenoid bone reconstruction procedures allow precise positioning of the graft, identification, and treatment of concomitant injuries with low morbidity and faster recovery. Given the problems associated with bone resorption and metal hardware protrusion, the new metal-free techniques for Latarjet or free bone block procedures seem a good solution to avoid these complications, although no long-term data are yet available. Cite this article:
We report the clinical results of glenoid osteotomy in patients
with atraumatic posteroinferior instability associated with glenoid
dysplasia. The study reports results in 211 patients (249 shoulders) with
atraumatic posteroinferior instability. The patients comprised 63
men and 148 women with a mean age of 20 years. The posteroinferior
glenoid surface was elevated by osteotomy at the scapular neck.
A body spica was applied to maintain the arm perpendicular to the
glenoid for two weeks postoperatively. Clinical results were evaluated
using the Rowe score and Japan Shoulder Society Shoulder Instability
Score (JSS-SIS); bone union, osteoarthrosis, and articular congruity
were examined on plain radiographs.Aims
Patients and Methods
The acetabular labrum is a soft-tissue structure
which lines the acetabular rim of the hip joint. Its role in hip
joint biomechanics and joint health has been of particular interest
over the past decade. In normal hip joint biomechanics, the labrum
is crucial in retaining a layer of pressurised intra-articular fluid
for joint lubrication and load support/distribution. Its seal around
the femoral head is further regarded as a contributing to hip stability through
its suction effect. The labrum itself is also important in increasing
contact area thereby reducing contact stress. Given the labrum’s
role in normal hip joint biomechanics, surgical techniques for managing
labral damage are continuously evolving as our understanding of
its anatomy and function continue to progress. The current paper
aims to review the anatomy and biomechanical function of the labrum
and how they are affected by differing surgical techniques. Take home message: The acetabular labrum plays a critical role
in hip function and maintaining and restoring its function during
surgical intervention remain an essential goal. Cite this article:
