We retrospectively analysed concentrations of chromium and cobalt ions in samples of synovial fluid and whole blood taken from a group of 92 patients with failed current-generation metal-on-metal hip replacements. We applied acid oxidative digestion to our trace metal analysis protocol, which found significantly higher levels of metal ion concentrations in blood and synovial fluid than a non-digestive method. Patients were subcategorised by mode of failure as either ‘unexplained pain’ or ‘defined causes’. Using this classification, chromium and cobalt ion levels were present over a wider range in synovial fluid and not as strongly correlated with blood ion levels as previously reported. There was no significant difference between metal ion concentrations and manufacturer of the implant, nor femoral head size below or above 50 mm. There was a moderately positive correlation between metal ion levels and acetabular component inclination angle as measured on three-dimensional CT imaging. Our results suggest that acid digestion of samples of synovial fluid samples is necessary to determine metal ion concentrations accurately so that meaningful comparisons can be made between studies.
Total hip replacement for developmental hip dysplasia
is challenging. The anatomical deformities on the acetabular and
femoral sides are difficult to predict. The Crowe classification
is usually used to describe these cases – however, it is not a very
helpful tool for pre-operative planning. Small acetabular components,
acetabular augments, and modular femoral components should be available
for all cases. Regardless of the Crowe classification, the surgeon must
be prepared to perform a femoral osteotomy for shortening, or to
correct rotation, and/or angulation. Cite this article:
We report a case of a male patient presenting
with bilateral painful but apparently well-positioned and -fixed
large-diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements four years post-operatively.
Multiple imaging modes revealed a thick-walled, cystic expansile
mass in communication with the hip joint (a pseudotumour). Implant
retrieval analysis and tissue culture eliminated high bearing wear
or infection as causes for the soft-tissue reaction, but noted marked corrosion
of the modular neck taper adaptor and corrosion products in the
tissues. Therefore, we believe corrosion products from the taper
caused by mismatch of the implant components led to pseudotumour
formation requiring revision.
We have undertaken a prospective, randomised study to compare conservation of acetabular bone after total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. We randomly assigned 210 hips to one of the two treatment groups. Uncemented, press-fit acetabular components were used for both. No significant difference was found in the mean diameter of acetabular implant inserted in the groups (54.74 mm for total hip replacement and 54.90 mm for resurfacing arthroplasty). In seven resurfacing procedures (6.8%), the surgeon used a larger size of component in order to match the corresponding diameter of the femoral component. With resurfacing arthroplasty, conservation of bone is clearly advantageous on the femoral side. Our study has shown that, with a specific design of acetabular implant and by following a careful surgical technique, removal of bone on the acetabular side is comparable with that of total hip replacement.
