The use of a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis in the management
of primary bone tumours in children is well established. However,
the efficacy of such a prosthesis in those requiring a revision
procedure has yet to be established. The aim of this series was
to present our results using extendable prostheses for the revision
of previous endoprostheses. All patients who had a noninvasive growing endoprosthesis inserted
at the time of a revision procedure were identified from our database.
A total of 21 patients (seven female patients, 14 male) with a mean
age of 20.4 years (10 to 41) at the time of revision were included.
The indications for revision were mechanical failure, trauma or infection
with a residual leg-length discrepancy. The mean follow-up was 70
months (17 to 128). The mean shortening prior to revision was 44 mm
(10 to 100). Lengthening was performed in all but one patient with
a mean lengthening of 51 mm (5 to 140).Aims
Patients and Methods
We conducted a case-control study to examine
the merit of silver-coated tumour prostheses. We reviewed 85 patients
with Agluna-treated (silver-coated) tumour implants treated between
2006 and 2011 and matched them with 85 control patients treated
between 2001 and 2011 with identical, but uncoated, tumour prostheses. In all, 106 men and 64 women with a mean age of 42.2 years (18.4
to 90.4) were included in the study. There were 50 primary reconstructions
(29.4%); 79 one-stage revisions (46.5%) and 41 two-stage revisions
for infection (24.1%). The overall post-operative infection rate of the silver-coated
group was 11.8% compared with 22.4% for the control group (p = 0.033,
chi-square test). A total of seven of the ten infected prostheses
in the silver-coated group were treated successfully with debridement,
antibiotics, and implant retention compared with only six of the
19 patients (31.6%) in the control group (p = 0.048, chi-square
test). Three patients in the silver-coated group (3.5%) and 13 controls
(15.3%) had chronic periprosthetic infection (p = 0.009, chi-square
test). The overall success rates in controlling infection by two-stage
revision in the silver-coated group was 85% (17/20) compared with
57.1% (12/21) in the control group (p = 0.05, chi-square test).
The Agluna-treated endoprostheses were associated with a lower rate
of early periprosthetic infection. These silver-treated implants
were particularly useful in two-stage revisions for infection and
in those patients with incidental positive cultures at the time
of implantation of the prosthesis. Debridement with antibiotic treatment and retention of the implant
appeared to be more successful with silver-coated implants. Cite this article:
The best method of reconstruction after resection of malignant tumours of the tibial diaphysis is unknown. In the absence of any long-term studies analysing the results of intercalary endoprosthetic replacement, we present a retrospective review of 18 patients who underwent limb salvage using a tibial diaphyseal endoprosthetic replacement following excision of a malignant bone tumour. There were ten men and eight women with a mean age of 42.5 years (16 to 76). Mean follow-up was 58.5 months (20 to 141) for all patients and 69.3 months (20 to 141) for the 12 patients still alive. Cumulative patient survival was 59% (95% confidence interval (CI) 32 to 84) at five years. Implant survival was 63% (95% CI 35 to 90) at ten years. Four patients required revision to a proximal tibial replacement at a mean follow-up of 29 months (10 to 54). Complications included metastases in five patients, aseptic loosening in four, peri-prosthetic fracture in two, infection in one and local recurrence in one. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and the mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score were 23 (17 to 28) and 74% (53 to 91), respectively. Although rates of complication and revision were high, custom-made tibial diaphyseal replacement following resection of malignant bone tumours enables early return to function and provides an attractive alternative to other surgical options, without apparent compromise of patient survival.
