Of 545 consecutive patients with anterior
In order to determine whether and for whom serial radiological evaluation is necessary in one-part proximal humerus fractures, we set out to describe the clinical history and predictors of secondary displacement in patients sustaining these injuries. Between January 2014 and April 2016, all patients with an isolated, nonoperatively treated one-part proximal humerus fracture were prospectively followed up. Clinical and radiological evaluation took place at less than two, six, 12, and 52 weeks. Fracture configuration, bone quality, and comminution were determined on the initial radiographs. Fracture healing, secondary displacement, and treatment changes were recorded during follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fracture clinics are often characterised by the referral of large
numbers of unselected patients with minor injuries not requiring
investigation or intervention, long waiting times and recurrent
unnecessary reviews. Our experience had been of an unsustainable
system and we implemented a ‘Trauma Triage Clinic’ (TTC) in order
to rationalise and regulate access to our fracture service. The
British Orthopaedic Association’s guidelines have required a prospective evaluation
of this change of practice, and we report our experience and results. We review the management of all 12 069 patients referred to our
service in the calendar year 2014, with a minimum of one year follow-up
during the calendar year 2015. Aims
Patients and Methods
We report on the use of the Ilizarov method to
treat 40 consecutive fractures of the tibial shaft (35 AO 42C fractures and
five AO 42B3 fractures) in adults. There were 28 men and
12 women with a mean age of 43 years (19 to 81). The series included
19 open fractures (six Gustilo grade 3A and 13 grade 3B) and 21
closed injuries. The mean time from injury to application of definitive
Ilizarov frame was eight days (0 to 35) with 36 fractures successfully
uniting without the need for any bone-stimulating procedure. The
four remaining patients with nonunion healed with a second frame.
There were no amputations and no deep infections. None required
intervention for malunion. The total time to healing was calculated
from date of injury to removal of the frame, with a median of 166
days (mean 187, (87 to 370)). Minor complications included snapped
wires in two patients and minor pin-site infections treated with
oral antibiotics in nine patients (23%). Clinical scores were available
for 32 of the 40 patients at a median of 55 months (mean 62, (26
to 99)) post-injury, with ‘good’ Olerud and Molander ankle scores
(median 80, mean 75, (10 to 100)), ‘excellent’ Lysholm knee scores
(median 97, mean 88, (29 to 100)), a median Tegner activity score
of 4 (mean 4, (0 to 9)) (comparable to ‘moderately heavy labour
/ cycling and jogging’) and Short Form-12 scores that exceeded the
mean of the population as a whole (median physical component score
55 (mean 51, (20 to 64)), median mental component score 57 (mean
53, (21 to 62)). In conclusion, the Ilizarov method is a safe and
reliable way of treating complex tibial shaft fractures with a high
rate of primary union.
The generally-accepted treatment for large, displaced fractures of the glenoid associated with traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder is operative repair. In this study, 14 consecutive patients with large (>
5 mm), displaced (>
2 mm) anteroinferior glenoid rim fractures were treated non-operatively if post-reduction radiographs showed a centred glenohumeral joint. After a mean follow-up of 5.6 years (2.8 to 8.4), the mean Constant score and subjective shoulder value were 98% (90% to 100%) and 97% (90% to 100%), respectively. There were no redislocations or subluxations, and the apprehension test was negative. All fragments healed with an average intra-articular step of 3.0 mm (0.5 to 11). No patient had symptoms of osteoarthritis, which was mild in two shoulders and moderate in one. Traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder, associated with a large displaced glenoid rim fracture can be successfully treated non-operatively, providing the glenohumeral joint is concentrically reduced on the anteroposterior radiograph.
Surgical dislocation of the hip in the treatment of acetabular fractures allows the femoral head to be safely displaced from the acetabulum. This permits full intra-articular acetabular and femoral inspection for the evaluation and potential treatment of cartilage lesions of the labrum and femoral head, reduction of the fracture under direct vision and avoidance of intra-articular penetration with hardware. We report 60 patients with selected types of acetabular fracture who were treated using this approach. Six were lost to follow-up and the remaining 54 were available for clinical and radiological review at a mean follow-up of 4.4 years (2 to 9). Substantial damage to the intra-articular cartilage was found in the anteromedial portion of the femoral head and the posterosuperior aspect of the acetabulum. Labral lesions were predominantly seen in the posterior acetabular area. Anatomical reduction was achieved in 50 hips (93%) which was considerably higher than that seen in previous reports. There were no cases of avascular necrosis. Four patients subsequently required total hip replacement. Good or excellent results were achieved in 44 hips (81.5%). The cumulative eight-year survivorship was 89.0% (95% confidence interval 84.5 to 94.1). Significant predictors of poor outcome were involvement of the acetabular dome and lesions of the femoral cartilage greater than grade 2. The functional mid-term results were better than those of previous reports. Surgical dislocation of the hip allows accurate reduction and a predictable mid-term outcome in the management of these difficult injuries without the risk of the development of avascular necrosis.