Wrist block has been used to provide pain relief
for many procedures on the hand and wrist but its role in arthroscopy
of the wrist remains unexplored. Chondrotoxicity has been a concern
with the intra-articular infiltration of local anaesthetic. We aimed
to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of portal and wrist
joint infiltration with a wrist block on the pain experienced by
patients after arthroscopy of the wrist. A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial was designed and
patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist under general anaesthesia
as a day case were recruited for the study. Levo-bupivacaine was
used for both techniques. The effects were evaluated using a ten-point
visual analogue scale, and the use of analgesic agents was also
compared. The primary outcomes for statistical analyses were the
mean pain scores and the use of analgesia post-operatively. A total of 34 patients (63% females) were recruited to the portal
and joint infiltration group and 32 patients (59% males) to the
wrist block group. Mean age was 40.8 years in the first group and
39.7 years in the second group (p >
0.05). Both techniques provided
effective pain relief in the first hour and 24 hours post-operatively
but wrist block gave better pain scores at bedtime on the day of
surgery (p = 0.007) and at 24 hours post-operatively (p = 0.006). Wrist block provides better and more reliable analgesia in patients
undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist without exposing patients to
the risk of chondrotoxicity. Cite this article:
We present an economic evaluation using data
from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT) to compare
the relative cost effectiveness of percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire)
fixation and volar locking-plate fixation for patients with dorsally-displaced
fractures of the distal radius. The cost effectiveness analysis (cost per quality-adjusted life
year; QALY) was derived from a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group,
assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial which took place in
18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Data from 460 patients
were available for analysis, which includes both a National Health
Service cost perspective including costs of surgery, implants and
healthcare resource use over a 12-month period after surgery, and
a societal perspective, which includes the cost of time off work
and the need for additional private care. There was only a small difference in QALYs gained for patients
treated with locking-plate fixation over those treated with K-wires.
At a mean additional cost of £714 (95% confidence interval 588 to
865) per patient, locking-plate fixation presented an incremental
cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £89 322 per QALY within the first
12 months of treatment. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to
assess the ICER of locking-plate fixation compared with K-wires.
These were greater than £30 000. Compared with locking-plate fixation, K-wire fixation is a ‘cost
saving’ intervention, with similar health benefits. Cite this article:
