The purpose of this study was to determine the access to and ability to use telemedicine technology in adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine associations with the socioeconomic characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, race, and education. We also sought to understand the patients’ perceived benefits, risks, and preferences when dealing with telemedicine. We performed a cross-sectional survey involving patients awaiting primary THA and TKA by one of six surgeons at a single academic institution. Patients were included and called for a telephone-administered survey if their surgery was scheduled to be between 23 March and 2 June 2020, and were aged > 18 years.Aims
Methods
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) has well known subjective benefits,
but little is known objectively about the recovery of mobility in
the early post-operative period. A total of 33 patients aged >
60 years who underwent elective
primary THA had their activity monitored for 30 days post-operatively
using an at-home (Fitbit) ankle accelerometer. Their mean age was
70.7 years (61 to 86); 15 (45.5%) were female. The rate of compliance
and the mean level of activity were determined. Comparisons between subgroups
based on age, body mass index (BMI), surgical approach, and the
destination of the patients when discharged were also performed.Aims
Patients and Methods
A high radiographic inclination angle (RI) contributes
to accelerated wear and has been associated with dislocation after
total hip arthroplasty (THA). With freehand positioning of the acetabular
component there is a lack of accuracy, with a trend towards a high
radiographic inclination angle. The aim of this study was to investigate
whether the use of a digital protractor to measure the operative
inclination angle (OI) could improve the positioning of the acetabular
component in relation to a ‘safe zone’. We measured the radiographic inclination angles of 200 consecutive
uncemented primary THAs. In the first 100 the component was introduced
freehand and in the second 100 a digital protractor was used to
measure the operative inclination angle. The mean difference between the operative and the radiographic
inclination angles
(∆RI–OI) in the second cohort was 12.3° (3.8° to 19.8°). There was
a strong correlation between the circumference of the hip and ∆RI–OI.
The number of RI outliers was significantly reduced in the protractor
group (p = 0.002). Adjusting the OI, using a digital protractor and taking into
account the circumference of the patient’s hip, improves the RI
significantly (p <
0.001) and does not require additional operating
time. Cite this article:
