Aims

Although good clinical outcomes have been reported for monolithic tapered, fluted, titanium stems (TFTS), early results showed high rates of subsidence. Advances in stem design may mitigate these concerns. This study reports on the use of a current monolithic TFTS for a variety of indications.

Aims

There are limited long-term studies reporting on outcomes of the Zimmer Modular Revision (ZMR) stem, and concerns remain regarding failure. Our primary aim was to determine long-term survival free from all-cause revision and stem-related failure for this modular revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary aims included evaluating radiological and functional outcomes.

Data on early morbidity and complications after revision total hip replacement (THR) are limited. The aim of this nationwide study was to describe and quantify early morbidity after aseptic revision THR and relate the morbidity to the extent of the revision surgical procedure. We analysed all aseptic revision THRs from 1st October 2009 to 30th September 2011 using the Danish National Patient Registry, with additional information from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. There were 1553 procedures (1490 patients) performed in 40 centres and we divided them into total revisions, acetabular component revisions, femoral stem revisions and partial revisions. The mean age of the patients was 70.4 years (25 to 98) and the median hospital stay was five days (interquartile range 3 to 7). Within 90 days of surgery, the readmission rate was 18.3%, mortality rate 1.4%, re-operation rate 6.1%, dislocation rate 7.0% and infection rate 3.0%. There were no differences in these outcomes between high- and low-volume centres. Of all readmissions, 255 (63.9%) were due to ‘surgical’ complications versus 144 (36.1%) ‘medical’ complications. Importantly, we found no differences in early morbidity across the surgical subgroups, despite major differences in the extent and complexity of operations. However, dislocations and the resulting morbidity represent the major challenge for improvement in aseptic revision THR. . Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1464–71

Aims

One-stage revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has several advantages; however, resection of the proximal femur might be necessary to achieve higher success rates. We investigated the risk factors for resection and re-revisions, and assessed complications and subsequent re-revisions.

Aims

Femoral cement-in-cement revision is a well described technique to reduce morbidity and complications in hip revision surgery. Traditional techniques for septic revision of hip arthroplasty necessitate removal of all bone cement from the femur. In our two centres, we have been using a cement-in-cement technique, leaving the distal femoral bone cement in selected patients for septic hip revision surgery, both for single and the first of two-stage revision procedures. A prerequisite for adoption of this technique is that the surgeon considers the cement mantle to be intimately fixed to bone without an intervening membrane between cement and host bone. We aim to report our experience for this technique.

We reviewed 351 cemented revisions of femoral stems performed for aseptic loosening. At a mean of six years after the revision operation 72.1% of the patients were pain-free and 21.4% had only mild or occasional discomfort. The latest radiographs showed definite stem loosening in 10 (2.8%) and 20 hips (5.7%) had required rerevision, only nine (2.6%) of which were for mechanical failure of the stem. Survivorship analysis, taking the end point as rerevision of the stem, gave 97.0% survival at eight years and 91.6% at 11 years. Excellent results both clinically and radiologically can be achieved by cemented revision of the femoral stem for aseptic loosening

Between March 1990 and May 1991 we performed 85 primary total hip replacements in 74 patients using the Landos Atoll hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated cup and the Corail HA-coated stem. The patients were followed up for a mean of ten years. Of the 85 cups, 26 (31%) have already been revised and a further six are radiologically unstable and awaiting revision. Two femoral stems have been revised for infection without loosening. The retrieved acetabular cups were studied by SEM and image-processing techniques to quantify the amount of residual HA on the cup. This was correlated with the clinical variables and modes of failure. The residual HA (as a percentage of the surface) on the loose cups correlated negatively with the duration of implantation (r = −0.732, p < 0.001). Six cups were stable at revision and had more residual HA coating than those which were loose (p < 0.01). The rate of failure of the Landos Atoll HA-coated, smooth hemispherical cup with screw fixation is unacceptably high. Resorption of the HA coating is markedly increased in loose cups compared with stable cups. HA coating cannot substitute for stable mechanical fixation

Aims

Femoral stems with exchangeable (modular) necks were introduced to offer surgeons an increased choice when determining the version, offset and length of the femoral neck during total hip arthroplasty (THA). It was hoped that this would improve outcomes and reduce complications, particularly dislocation. In 2010, the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) first reported an increased rate of revision after primary THA using femoral stems with an exchangeable neck. The aim of this study was to provide a more comprehensive up-to-date analysis of primary THA using femoral stems with exchangeable and fixed necks.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of Vancouver type B2 and B3 fractures by performing a systematic review of the methods of surgical treatment which have been reported.

Aims

The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients using either a conventional (CPE) or a highly cross-linked (HXLPE) polyethylene liner in terms of functional outcome, incidence of osteolysis, radiological wear and rate of revision.