Our purpose was to determine the quality of current randomised
controlled trials (RCTs) in hand surgery using standardised metrics. Based on five-year mean impact factors, we selected the six journals
that routinely publish studies of upper extremity surgery. Using
a journal-specific search query, 62 RCTs met our inclusion criteria.
Then three blinded reviewers used the Jadad and revised Coleman Methodology
Score (RCMS) to assess the quality of the manuscripts.Aims
Materials and Methods
There is no consensus on the benefit of arthroscopically
assisted reduction of the articular surface combined with fixation
using a volar locking plate for the treatment of intra-articular
distal radial fractures. In this study we compared the functional
and radiographic outcomes of fluoroscopically and arthroscopically
guided reduction of these fractures. Between February 2009 and May 2013, 74 patients with unilateral
unstable intra-articular distal radial fractures were randomised
equally into the two groups for treatment. The mean age of these
74 patients was 64 years (24 to 92). We compared functional outcomes
including active range of movement of the wrist, grip strength and Disabilities
of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at six and 48 weeks; and radiographic
outcomes that included gap, step, radial inclination, volar angulation
and ulnar variance. There were no significant differences between the techniques
with regard to functional outcomes or radiographic parameters. The
mean gap and step in the fluoroscopic and arthroscopic groups were
comparable at 0.9 mm (standard deviation Arthroscopic reduction conferred no advantage over conventional
fluoroscopic guidance in achieving anatomical reduction of intra-articular
distal radial fractures when using a volar locking plate. Cite this article:
We present an economic evaluation using data
from the Distal Radius Acute Fracture Fixation Trial (DRAFFT) to compare
the relative cost effectiveness of percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire)
fixation and volar locking-plate fixation for patients with dorsally-displaced
fractures of the distal radius. The cost effectiveness analysis (cost per quality-adjusted life
year; QALY) was derived from a multi-centre, two-arm, parallel group,
assessor-blind, randomised controlled trial which took place in
18 trauma centres in the United Kingdom. Data from 460 patients
were available for analysis, which includes both a National Health
Service cost perspective including costs of surgery, implants and
healthcare resource use over a 12-month period after surgery, and
a societal perspective, which includes the cost of time off work
and the need for additional private care. There was only a small difference in QALYs gained for patients
treated with locking-plate fixation over those treated with K-wires.
At a mean additional cost of £714 (95% confidence interval 588 to
865) per patient, locking-plate fixation presented an incremental
cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £89 322 per QALY within the first
12 months of treatment. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to
assess the ICER of locking-plate fixation compared with K-wires.
These were greater than £30 000. Compared with locking-plate fixation, K-wire fixation is a ‘cost
saving’ intervention, with similar health benefits. Cite this article:
