Surgical costs are a major component of healthcare expenditures in the USA. Intraoperative communication is a key factor contributing to patient outcomes. However, the effectiveness of communication is only partially determined by the surgeon, and understanding how non-surgeon personnel affect intraoperative communication is critical for the development of safe and cost-effective staffing guidelines. Operative efficiency is also dependent on high-functioning teams and can offer a proxy for effective communication in highly standardized procedures like primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. We aimed to evaluate how the composition and dynamics of surgical teams impact operative efficiency during arthroplasty. We performed a retrospective review of staff characteristics and operating times for 112 surgeries (70 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and 42 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs)) conducted by a single surgeon over a one-year period. Each surgery was evaluated in terms of operative duration, presence of surgeon-preferred staff, and turnover of trainees, nurses, and other non-surgical personnel, controlling cases for body mass index, presence of osteoarthritis, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score.Aims
Methods
Post-operative complications after total hip
or knee replacement can delay recovery, prolong hospitalisation, increase
rates of re-admission and, in the most severe cases, lead to long-term
disability or even death. In this analysis of pooled data from four
large, randomised, phase III clinical trials that compared the oral,
direct Factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban with subcutaneous enoxaparin
for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or
knee replacement (n = 12 729), the incidence of complications, including
bleeding and adverse events related to surgery (such as wound infection,
wound dehiscence and haemarthrosis) are reported. Interventions
and procedures relating to surgery are also compared between the
groups. Bleeding events, including excessive wound haematoma and
surgical-site bleeding, occurred at similar rates in the rivaroxaban
and enoxaparin groups. Over the total study duration, adverse surgical
events occurred at a similar rate in the rivaroxaban group compared
with the enoxaparin group after total knee replacement (2.26% This analysis shows that the incidence of adverse surgical events
with rivaroxaban was similar to enoxaparin.
A once-daily dose of rivaroxaban 10 mg, an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor, was compared with enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily for prevention of venous thromboembolism in three studies of patients undergoing elective hip and knee replacement (RECORD programme). A pooled analysis of data from these studies (n = 9581) showed that rivaroxaban was more effective than enoxaparin in reducing the incidence of the composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality at two weeks (0.4% vs 0.8%, respectively, odds ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.79; p = 0.005), and at the end of the planned medication period (0.5% vs 1.3%, respectively; odds ratio 0.38; 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.62; p <
0.001). The rate of major bleeding was similar at two weeks (0.2% for both) and at the end of the planned medication period (0.3% vs 0.2%). Rivaroxaban started six to eight hours after surgery was more effective than enoxaparin started the previous evening in preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality, without increasing major bleeding.
