Wrist block has been used to provide pain relief
for many procedures on the hand and wrist but its role in arthroscopy
of the wrist remains unexplored. Chondrotoxicity has been a concern
with the intra-articular infiltration of local anaesthetic. We aimed
to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of portal and wrist
joint infiltration with a wrist block on the pain experienced by
patients after arthroscopy of the wrist. A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial was designed and
patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist under general anaesthesia
as a day case were recruited for the study. Levo-bupivacaine was
used for both techniques. The effects were evaluated using a ten-point
visual analogue scale, and the use of analgesic agents was also
compared. The primary outcomes for statistical analyses were the
mean pain scores and the use of analgesia post-operatively. A total of 34 patients (63% females) were recruited to the portal
and joint infiltration group and 32 patients (59% males) to the
wrist block group. Mean age was 40.8 years in the first group and
39.7 years in the second group (p >
0.05). Both techniques provided
effective pain relief in the first hour and 24 hours post-operatively
but wrist block gave better pain scores at bedtime on the day of
surgery (p = 0.007) and at 24 hours post-operatively (p = 0.006). Wrist block provides better and more reliable analgesia in patients
undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist without exposing patients to
the risk of chondrotoxicity. Cite this article:
We hypothesised that the use of pulsed electromagnetic
field (PEMF) bone growth stimulation in acute scaphoid fractures
would significantly shorten the time to union and reduce the number
of nonunions in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre
trial. A total of 102 patients (78 male, 24 female; mean age 35
years (18 to 77)) from five different medical centres with a unilateral
undisplaced acute scaphoid fracture were randomly allocated to PEMF
(n = 51) or placebo (n = 51) and assessed with regard to functional
and radiological outcomes (multiplanar reconstructed CT scans) at
6, 9, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. The overall time to clinical and radiological healing
did not differ significantly between the active PEMF group and the
placebo group. We concluded that the addition of PEMF bone growth
stimulation to the conservative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures
does not accelerate bone healing. Cite this article: