Guided growth using eight-plates is commonly used for correction
of angular limb deformities in growing children. The principle is
of tethering at the physeal periphery while enabling growth in the
rest of the physis. The method is also applied for epiphysiodesis
to correct limb-length discrepancy (LLD). Concerns have been raised
regarding the potential of this method to create an epiphyseal deformity.
However, this has not been investigated. The purpose of this study
was to detect and quantify the occurrence of deformities in the
proximal tibial epiphysis following treatment with eight-plates. A retrospective study was performed including 42 children at
a mean age of 10.8 years (3.7 to 15.7) undergoing eight-plate insertion
in the proximal tibia for correction of coronal plane deformities
or LLD between 2007 and 2015. A total of 64 plates were inserted;
48 plates (34 patients) were inserted to correct angular deformities
and 16 plates (8 patients) for LLD. Medical records, Picture Archive
and Communication System images, and conventional radiographs were
reviewed. Measurements included interscrew angle, lateral and medial
plateau slope angles measured between the plateau surface and the
line between the ends of the physis, and tibial plateau roof angle defined
as 180° minus the sum of both plateau angles. Measurements were
compared between radiographs performed adjacent to surgery and those
at latest follow-up, and between operated and non-operated plateaus. Statistical
analysis was performed using BMDP Statistical Software.Aims
Patients and Methods
Eight-plates are used to correct varus-valgus deformity (VVD) or limb-length discrepancy (LLD) in children and adolescents. It was reported that these implants might create a bony deformity within the knee joint by change of the roof angle (RA) after epiphysiodesis of the proximal tibia following a radiological assessment limited to anteroposterior (AP) radiographs. The aim of this study was to analyze the RA, complemented with lateral knee radiographs, with focus on the tibial slope (TS) and the degree of deformity correction. A retrospective, single-centre study was conducted. The treatment group (n = 64 knees in 44 patients) was subclassified according to the implant location in two groups: 1) medial hemiepiphysiodesis; and 2) lateral hemiepiphysiodesis. A third control group consisted of 25 untreated knees. The limb axes and RA were measured on long standing AP leg radiographs. Lateral radiographs of 40 knees were available for TS analysis. The mean age of the patients was 10.6 years (4 to 15) in the treatment group and 8.4 years (4 to 14) in the control group. Implants were removed after a mean 1.2 years (0.5 to 3).Aims
Methods
