Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 8 | Pages 905 - 911
1 Aug 2023
Giannicola G Amura A Sessa P Prigent S Cinotti G

Aims

The aim of this study was to analyze how proximal radial neck resorption (PRNR) starts and progresses radiologically in two types of press-fit radial head arthroplasties (RHAs), and to investigate its clinical relevance.

Methods

A total of 97 patients with RHA were analyzed: 56 received a bipolar RHA (Group 1) while 41 received an anatomical implant (Group 2). Radiographs were performed postoperatively and after three, six, nine, and 12 weeks, six, nine, 12, 18, and 24 months, and annually thereafter. PRNR was measured in all radiographs in the four radial neck quadrants. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and the patient-assessed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score - Elbow (pASES-E) were used for the clinical assessment. Radiological signs of implant loosening were investigated.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 107-B, Issue 2 | Pages 181 - 187
1 Feb 2025
Barret H Tiercelin J Godenèche A Charousset C Audebert S Lefebvre Y Gallinet D Barth J Bonnevialle N

Aims. Loosening of the glenoid component in the long term remains an important complication of the anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). The aim of this study was to explore the bony integration of a hybrid glenoid component based on an analysis of CT scans. Methods. In a prospective multicentre study, patients who underwent primary aTSA, whose hybrid design of glenoid component included a fully-polyethylene flanged upper peg and a porous-coated titanium lower peg, and who were reviewed with CT scans between 12 and 24 months postoperatively, were included. Two independent observers reviewed the scans. Bony integration of the upper peg was scored as described by Arnold et al, and integration of the lower peg was scored as described by Gulotta et al. Perforation of the glenoid vault in any plane was also assessed. Results. From an initial group of 120 aTSAs in 116 patients, 104 CT scans were analyzed in 100 patients (four bilateral shoulders, mean age 66 years (SD 11), 62 female and 38 male). Osteolysis around the upper peg was found in 32 patients (32 aTSAs; 31%). Of the remaining patients, 72 had a mean Arnold score of 5.6 points (SD 0.9), and 70 (67%) had perfect integration. The lower peg had a mean Gulotta score of 6.5 points (SD 1.4). There was perfect integration of the lower peg in 70 patients (70 aTSAs; 67%). A total of nine patients (nine aTSAs; 9%) had no bony integration at either peg. There was perforation of the glenoid in an anterior or posterior direction at the level of the upper peg in three and 28 patients, respectively. This occurred at the level of the lower peg in 11 and 18 patients, respectively. The inter- and intraobserver reliability was good (k = 0.782 and 0.86, respectively). No implant breakage occurred at a mean follow-up of 16 months (12 to 24). The clinical outcome was satisfactory at a mean follow-up of 32 months (24 to 35), as assessed by a visual analogue scale score for pain, the Constant-Murley score, Subjective Shoulder Value, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Conclusion. Short-term CT scan analysis of a new hybrid anatomical glenoid component found perfect bony integration around the lower porous coated titanium peg in 90% of patients. The upper polyethylene flanged peg had bony integration in 70 patients (70 aTSAs; 67%). Longer follow-up is needed to analyze the rate of survival of this component. The short-term clinical outcome was satisfactory. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(2):181–187


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 5 | Pages 482 - 491
1 May 2024
Davies A Sabharwal S Liddle AD Zamora Talaya MB Rangan A Reilly P

Aims

Metal and ceramic humeral head bearing surfaces are available choices in anatomical shoulder arthroplasties. Wear studies have shown superior performance of ceramic heads, however comparison of clinical outcomes according to bearing surface in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) is limited. This study aimed to compare the rates of revision and reoperation following metal and ceramic humeral head TSA and HA using data from the National Joint Registry (NJR), which collects data from England, Wales, Northern Ireland, Isle of Man and the States of Guernsey.

Methods

NJR shoulder arthroplasty records were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics and the National Mortality Register. TSA and HA performed for osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with an intact rotator cuff were included. Metal and ceramic humeral head prostheses were matched within separate TSA and HA groups using propensity scores based on 12 and 11 characteristics, respectively. The primary outcome was time to first revision and the secondary outcome was non-revision reoperation.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1197 - 1203
1 Sep 2017
Laumonerie P Reina N Ancelin D Delclaux S Tibbo ME Bonnevialle N Mansat P

Aims

Radial head arthroplasty (RHA) may be used in the treatment of non-reconstructable radial head fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical and radiographic results of RHA.

Patients and Methods

Between 2002 and 2014, 77 RHAs were implanted in 54 men and 23 women with either acute injuries (54) or with traumatic sequelae (23) of a fracture of the radial head. Four designs of RHA were used, including the Guepar (Small Bone Innovations (SBi)/Stryker; 36), Evolutive (Aston Medical; 24), rHead RECON (SBi/Stryker; ten) or rHead STANDARD (SBi/Stryker; 7) prostheses. The mean follow-up was 74.0 months (standard deviation (sd) 38.6; 24 to 141). The indication for further surgery, range of movement, mean Mayo Elbow Performance (MEP) score, quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) score, osteolysis and positioning of the implant were also assessed according to the design, and acute or delayed use.