The aims of this study were to investigate the mortality following a proximal humeral fracture. Data from a large population-based fracture register were used to quantify 30-day, 90-day, and one-year mortality rates after a proximal humeral fracture. Associations between the risk of mortality and the type of fracture and its treatment were assessed, and mortality rates were compared between patients who sustained a fracture and the general population. All patients with a proximal humeral fracture recorded in the Swedish Fracture Register between 2011 and 2017 were included in the study. Those who died during follow-up were identified via linkage with the Swedish Tax Agency population register. Age- and sex-adjusted controls were retrieved from Statistics Sweden and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated.Aims
Methods
To compare the early management and mortality of older patients
sustaining major orthopaedic trauma with that of a younger population
with similar injuries. The Trauma Audit Research Network database was reviewed to identify
eligible patients admitted between April 2012 and June 2015. Distribution
and severity of injury, interventions, comorbidity, critical care
episodes and mortality were recorded. The population was divided
into young (64 years or younger) and older (65 years and older) patients.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures of the distal femur can be challenging to manage and
are on the increase in the elderly osteoporotic population. Management
with casting or bracing can unacceptably limit a patient’s ability
to bear weight, but historically, operative fixation has been associated
with a high rate of re-operation. In this study, we describe the outcomes
of fixation using modern implants within a strategy of early return
to function. All patients treated at our centre with lateral distal femoral
locking plates (LDFLP) between 2009 and 2014 were identified. Fracture
classification and operative information including weight-bearing
status, rates of union, re-operation, failure of implants and mortality
rate, were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
Our aim in this study was to describe the long-term survival
of the native hip joint after open reduction and internal fixation
of a displaced fracture of the acetabulum. We also present long-term
clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with a poor outcome. A total of 285 patients underwent surgery for a displaced acetabular
fracture between 1993 and 2005. For the survival analysis 253 were
included, there were 197 men and 56 women with a mean age of 42
years (12 to 78). The mean follow-up of 11 years (1 to 20) was identified
from our pelvic fracture registry. There were 99 elementary and 154
associated fracture types. For the long-term clinical follow-up,
192 patients with complete data were included. Their mean age was
40 years (13 to 78) with a mean follow-up of 12 years (5 to 20).
Injury to the femoral head and acetabular impaction were assessed
with CT scans and patients with an ipsilateral fracture of the femoral
head were excluded.Aims
Patients and Methods
We prospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy
of the gravity stress test and clinical findings to evaluate the stability
of the ankle mortise in patients with supination–external rotation-type
fractures of the lateral malleolus without widening of the medial
clear space. The cohort included 79 patients with a mean age of
44 years (16 to 82). Two surgeons assessed medial tenderness, swelling
and ecchymosis and performed the external rotation (ER) stress test
(a reference standard). A diagnostic radiographer performed the
gravity stress test. For the gravity stress test, the positive likelihood ratio (LR)
was 5.80 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.75 to 12.27, and
the negative LR was 0.15 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.35), suggesting a moderate
change from the pre-test probability. Medial tenderness, both alone
and in combination with swelling and/or ecchymosis, indicated a
small change (positive LR, 2.74 to 3.25; negative LR, 0.38 to 0.47),
whereas swelling and ecchymosis indicated only minimal changes (positive
LR, 1.41 to 1.65; negative LR, 0.38 to 0.47). In conclusion, when gravity stress test results are in agreement
with clinical findings, the result is likely to predict stability
of the ankle mortise with an accuracy equivalent to ER stress test
results. When clinical examination suggests a medial-side injury,
however, the gravity stress test may give a false negative result. Cite this article:
