The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of non-selective
and selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in
preventing heterotopic ossification (HO) after total hip arthroplasty
(THA). A thorough and systematic literature search was conducted and
29 studies were found that met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted
and statistical analysis was carried out generating forest plots.Aims
Methods
We aimed to assess the influence of ethnicity on the incidence
of heterotopic ossification (HO) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We studied the six-month post-operative anteroposterior radiographs
of 1449 consecutive primary THAs (1324 patients) and retrospectively
graded them for the presence of HO, using the Brooker Classification. Aims
Patients and Methods
Degenerative problems of the hip in patients
with childhood and adult onset neuromuscular disorders can be challenging
to treat. Many orthopaedic surgeons are reluctant to recommend total
hip replacement (THR) for patients with underlying neuromuscular
disorders due to the perceived increased risks of dislocation, implant loosening,
and lack of information about the functional outcomes and potential
benefits of these procedures in these patients. Modular femoral
components and alternative bearings which facilitate the use of
large femoral heads, constrained acetabular components and perhaps
more importantly, a better understanding about the complications
and outcomes of THR in the patient with neuromuscular disorders,
make this option viable. This paper will review the current literature
and our experience with THR in the more frequently encountered neuromuscular
disorders. Cite this article:
We have reviewed the current literature to compare
the results of surgery aimed to repair or debride a damaged acetabular
labrum. We identified 28 studies to be included in the review containing
a total of 1631 hips in 1609 patients. Of these studies 12 reported
a mean rate of good results of 82% (from 67% to 100%) for labral debridement.
Of the 16 studies that reported a combination of debridement and
re-attachment, five reported a comparative outcome for the two methods,
four reported better results with re-attachment and one study did
not find any significant difference in outcomes. Due to the heterogeneity
of the studies it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis or
draw accurate conclusions. Confounding factors in the studies include
selection bias, use of historical controls and high rates of loss
of follow-up. It seems logical to repair an unstable tear in a good quality
labrum with good potential to heal in order potentially to preserve
its physiological function. A degenerative labrum on the other hand
may be the source of discomfort and its preservation may result
in persistent pain and the added risk of failure of re-attachment.
The results of the present study do not support routine refixation
for all labral tears. Cite this article:
