The management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging. The correct antibiotic management remains elusive due to differences in epidemiology and resistance between countries, and reports in the literature. Before the efficacy of surgical treatment is investigated, it is crucial to analyze the bacterial strains causing PJI, especially for patients in whom no organisms are grown. A review of all revision TKAs which were undertaken between 2006 and 2018 in a tertiary referral centre was performed, including all those meeting the consensus criteria for PJI, in which organisms were identified. Using a cluster analysis, three chronological time periods were created. We then evaluated the antibiotic resistance of the identified bacteria between these three clusters and the effectiveness of our antibiotic regime.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to assess total knee arthroplasty (TKA) volume and rates of early complications in morbidly obese patients over the last decade, where the introduction of quality models influencing perioperative care pathways occurred. Patients undergoing TKA between 2011 to 2018 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were stratified by BMI < 40 kg/m2 and ≥ 40 kg/m2 and evaluated by the number of cases per year. The 30-day rates of any complication, wound complications, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed. Trends in these endpoints over the study period were compared between groups using odds ratios (ORs) and multivariate analyses.Aims
Methods
There has been a significant reduction in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures recorded in Australia. This follows several national joint registry studies documenting high UKA revision rates when compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the recent introduction of robotically assisted UKA procedures, it is hoped that outcomes improve. This study examines the cumulative revision rate of UKA procedures implanted with a newly introduced robotic system and compares the results to one of the best performing non-robotically assisted UKA prostheses, as well as all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures. Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry (AOANJRR) for all UKA procedures performed for osteoarthritis (OA) between 2015 and 2018 were analyzed. Procedures using the Restoris MCK UKA prosthesis implanted using the Mako Robotic-Arm Assisted System were compared to non-robotically assisted Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System (ZUK) UKA, a commonly used UKA with previously reported good outcomes and to all other non-robotically assisted UKA procedures using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) and Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship.Aim
Methods
This non-blinded randomised controlled trial compared the effect
of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) A total of 242 patients were randomised; 20 were excluded due
to failure of spinal anaesthesia leaving 109 patients in the PCEA
group and 113 in the LIA group. Patients were reviewed at six weeks
and one year post-operatively.Aims
Patients and Methods
This study demonstrates a significant correlation
between the American Knee Society (AKS) Clinical Rating System and
the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and provides a validated prediction
tool to estimate score conversion. A total of 1022 patients were prospectively clinically assessed
five years after TKR and completed AKS assessments and an OKS questionnaire.
Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between
OKS and the AKS knee and function scores but a stronger correlation
(r = 0.68, p <
0.001) when using the sum of the AKS knee and
function scores. Addition of body mass index and age (other statistically
significant predictors of OKS) to the algorithm did not significantly
increase the predictive value. The simple regression model was used to predict the OKS in a
group of 236 patients who were clinically assessed nine to ten years
after TKR using the AKS system. The predicted OKS was compared with
actual OKS in the second group. Intra-class correlation demonstrated
excellent reliability (r = 0.81, 95% confidence intervals 0.75 to
0.85) for the combined knee and function score when used to predict
OKS. Our findings will facilitate comparison of outcome data from
studies and registries using either the OKS or the AKS scores and
may also be of value for those undertaking meta-analyses and systematic
reviews. Cite this article:
