Episodic, or bundled payments, is a concept now
familiar to most in the healthcare arena, but the models are often
misunderstood. Under a traditional fee-for-service model, each provider
bills separately for their services which creates financial incentives
to maximise volumes. Under a bundled payment, a single entity, often
referred to as a convener (maybe the hospital, the physician group,
or a third party) assumes the risk through a payer contract for
all services provided within a defined episode of care, and receives
a single (bundled) payment for all services provided for that episode.
The time frame around the intervention is variable, but defined
in advance, as are included and excluded costs. Timing of the actual payment
in a bundle may either be before the episode occurs (prospective
payment model), or after the end of the episode through a reconciliation
(retrospective payment model). In either case, the defined costs
over the defined time frame are borne by the convener. Cite this article:
The United States and Canada are in the midst
of an epidemic of the use, misuse and overdose of opioids, and deaths
related to overdose. This is the direct result of overstatement
of the benefits and understatement of the risks of using opioids
by advocates and pharmaceutical companies. Massive amounts of prescription
opioids entered the community and were often diverted and misused.
Most other parts of the world achieve comparable pain relief using
fewer opioids. The misconceptions about opioids that created this epidemic are
finding their way around the world. There is particular evidence
of the increased prescription of strong opioids in Europe. Opioids are addictive and dangerous. Evidence is mounting that
the best pain relief is obtained through resilience. Opioids are
often prescribed when treatments to increase resilience would be
more effective. Cite this article:
The importance of accurate identification and reporting of surgical
site infection (SSI) is well recognised but poorly defined. Public
Health England (PHE) mandated collection of orthopaedic SSI data
in 2004. Data submission is required in one of four categories (hip
prosthesis, knee prosthesis, repair of neck of femur, reduction
of long bone fracture) for one quarter per year. Trusts are encouraged
to carry out post-discharge surveillance but this is not mandatory.
Recent papers in the orthopaedic literature have highlighted the
importance of SSI surveillance and the heterogeneity of surveillance
methods. However, details of current orthopaedic SSI surveillance
practice has not been described or quantified. All 147 NHS trusts in England were audited using a structured
questionnaire. Data was collected in the following categories: data
collection; data submission to PHE; definitions used; resource constraints;
post-discharge surveillance and SSI rates in the four PHE categories.
The response rate was 87.7%.Aims
Patients and Methods
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a major orthopaedic
intervention. The length of a patient's stay has been progressively
reduced with the introduction of enhanced recovery protocols: day-case
surgery has become the ultimate challenge. This narrative review shows the potential limitations of day-case
TKA. These constraints may be social, linked to patient’s comorbidities,
or due to surgery-related adverse events (e.g. pain, post-operative
nausea and vomiting, etc.). Using patient stratification, tailored surgical techniques and
multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, day-case TKA might be achievable
in a limited group of patients. The younger, male patient without
comorbidities and with an excellent social network around him might
be a candidate. Demographic changes, effective recovery programmes and less invasive
surgical techniques such as unicondylar knee arthroplasty, may increase
the size of the group of potential day-case patients. The cost reduction achieved by day-case TKA needs to be balanced
against any increase in morbidity and mortality and the cost of
advanced follow-up at a distance with new technology. These factors
need to be evaluated before adopting this ultimate ‘fast-track’
approach. Cite this article:
Given the growing prevalence of obesity around
the world and its association with osteoarthritis of the knee, orthopaedic
surgeons need to be familiar with the management of the obese patient
with degenerative knee pain. The precise mechanism by which obesity
leads to osteoarthritis remains unknown, but is likely to be due
to a combination of mechanical, humoral and genetic factors. Weight loss has clear medical benefits for the obese patient
and seems to be a logical way of relieving joint pain associated
with degenerative arthritis. There are a variety of ways in which
this may be done including diet and exercise, and treatment with
drugs and bariatric surgery. Whether substantial weight loss can
delay or even reverse the symptoms associated with osteoarthritis
remains to be seen. Surgery for osteoarthritis in the obese patient can be technically
more challenging and carries a risk of additional complications.
Substantial weight loss before undertaking total knee replacement
is advisable. More prospective studies that evaluate the effect
of significant weight loss on the evolution of symptomatic osteoarthritis
of the knee are needed so that orthopaedic surgeons can treat this
patient group appropriately.
