The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is the only mechanical connection between the axial skeleton and lower limbs. Following iliosacral resection, there is debate on whether reconstruction of the joint is necessary. There is a paucity of data comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing reconstruction and those who are not formally reconstructed. A total of 60 patients (25 females, 35 males; mean age 39 years (SD 18)) undergoing iliosacral resection were reviewed. Most resections were performed for primary malignant tumours (n = 54; 90%). The mean follow-up for surviving patients was nine years (2 to 19).Aims
Methods
Hip reconstruction after resection of a periacetabular chondrosarcoma is complex and associated with a high rate of complications. Previous reports have compared no reconstruction with historical techniques that are no longer used. The aim of this study was to compare the results of tantalum acetabular reconstruction to both historical techniques and no reconstruction. We reviewed 66 patients (45 males and 21 females) with a mean age of 53 years (24 to 81) who had undergone acetabular resection for chondrosarcoma. A total of 36 patients (54%) underwent acetabular reconstruction, most commonly with a saddle prosthesis (n = 13; 36%) or a tantalum total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n = 10; 28%). Mean follow-up was nine years (SD 4).Aims
Methods
The aims of this retrospective study were to report the feasibility
of using 3D-printing technology for patients with a pelvic tumour
who underwent reconstruction. A total of 35 patients underwent resection of a pelvic tumour
and reconstruction using 3D-printed endoprostheses between September
2013 and December 2015. According to Enneking’s classification of
bone defects, there were three Type I lesions, 12 Type II+III lesions,
five Type I+II lesions, two Type I+II+III lesions, ten type I+II+IV
lesions and three type I+II+III+IV lesions. A total of three patients
underwent reconstruction using an iliac prosthesis, 12 using a standard
hemipelvic prosthesis and 20 using a screw-rod connected hemipelvic
prosthesis.Aims
Patients and Methods
We report our early experience with the use of
a new prosthesis, the Modular Hemipelvic Prosthesis II, for reconstruction
of the hemipelvis after resection of a primary malignant peri-acetabular
tumour involving the sacroiliac joint. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 17 patients who had
undergone resection of a pelvic tumour and reconstruction with this
prosthesis between July 2002 and July 2010. One patient had a type I+II+III+IV resection (ilium + peri-acetabulum
+ pubis/ischium + sacrum) and 16 had a type I+II+IV resection (ilium
+ acetabulum + sacrum). The outcome was assessed at a mean follow-up
of 33 months (15 to 59). One patient was alive with disease, 11
were alive without disease and five had died of disease. The overall
five-year survival rate was 62.4%. Six patients had a local recurrence.
The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 58% (33 to 77).
Deep infection occurred in two patients, problems with wound healing
in five and dislocation in one. For patients with a primary malignant peri-acetabular sarcoma
involving the sacroiliac joint, we believe that this new prosthesis
is a viable option for reconstruction of the bony defect left following
resection of the tumour. It results in a satisfactory functional
outcome with an acceptable rate of complications. Cite this article:
