Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 18 of 18
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 5 | Pages 422 - 424
1 May 2024
Theologis T Perry DC

In 2017, the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery engaged the profession and all relevant stakeholders in two formal research prioritization processes. In this editorial, we describe the impact of this prioritization on funding, and how research in children’s orthopaedics, which was until very recently a largely unfunded and under-investigated area, is now flourishing. Establishing research priorities was a crucial step in this process.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5):422–424.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 6 | Pages 590 - 592
1 Jun 2023
Manktelow ARJ Mitchell P Haddad FS

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):590–592.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 8 | Pages 837 - 838
1 Aug 2023
Kelly M McNally SA Dhesi JK


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 4 | Pages 303 - 306
1 Apr 2024
Staats K Kayani B Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 6 | Pages 645 - 646
1 Jun 2022
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 4 | Pages 597 - 599
1 Apr 2021
Kader DF Oussedik S Kader N Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 6 | Pages 1007 - 1008
1 Jun 2021
Johansen A Inman DS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Jan 2021
Parker M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 | Pages 655 - 657
1 Jun 2020
Minhas Z Ganau M Thakar C Reynolds J Rothenfluh D Bojanic S Grannum S Chaudhary BR Pyrovolou N Sikander M Bowden G Patel UJ Nnadi C


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1277 - 1278
1 Oct 2020
Hughes R Hallstrom B Schemanske C Howard PW Wilton T


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1109 - 1110
14 Sep 2020
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 5 | Pages 545 - 546
1 May 2020
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 3 | Pages 233 - 235
1 Mar 2019
Ollivere BJ Marson BA Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1265 - 1266
1 Oct 2017
Jacofsky DJ Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 150
1 Feb 2017
Costa ML Tutton E Achten J Grant R Slowther AM

Traditionally, informed consent for clinical research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time as they need to discuss the study information with their friends and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency?

This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries and emergencies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:147–150.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1427 - 1430
1 Nov 2016
Powell JM Rai A Foy M Casey A Dabke H Gibson A Hutton M

Many hospitals do not have a structured process of consent, the attainment of which can often be rather ‘last-minute’ and somewhat chaotic. This is a surprising state of affairs as spinal surgery is a high-risk surgical specialty with potential for expensive litigation claims. More recently, the Montgomery ruling by the United Kingdom Supreme Court has placed the subject of informed consent into the spotlight.

There is a paucity of practical guidance on how a consent process can be achieved in a busy clinical setting. The British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS) has convened a working party to address this need. To our knowledge this is the first example of a national professional body, representing a single surgical specialty, taking such a fundamental initiative.

In a hard-pressed clinical environment, the ability to achieve admission reliably on the day of surgery, in patients at ease with their situation and with little likelihood of late cancellation, will be of great benefit. It will reduce litigation and improve the patient experience.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1427–30.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1011 - 1013
1 Aug 2016
Masters JPM Nanchahal J Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 6 | Pages 721 - 722
1 Jun 2016
Haddad FS