We evaluated the construct validity of the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating scale (Enneking score) as a functional measure for patients with sarcoma involving the upper limb. We compared the Enneking score by examining the correlation between two patient-derived outcome measures, the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) as indicators of functional status in 40 patients with malignant or aggressive benign bone and soft-tissue tumours of the upper limb who had undergone surgical treatment. The frequency distributions were similar among the three scoring systems. As for the validity, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of the Enneking score to the DASH questionnaire was −0.79 and that of the Enneking to the SF-36 subscales ranged from 0.38 to 0.60. Despite being a measure from the surgeon’s perspective, the Enneking score was shown to be a valid indicator of physical disability in patients with malignant or aggressive benign tumours of the upper limb and reflected their opinion.
In patients with a tumour affecting the distal
ulna it is difficult to preserve the function of the wrist following extensive
local resection. We report the outcome of 12 patients (nine female,
three male) who underwent excision of the distal ulna without local
soft-tissue reconstruction. In six patients, an aggressive benign
tumour was present and six had a malignant tumour. At a mean follow-up
of 64 months (15 to 132) the mean Musculoskeletal Tumour score was
64% (40% to 93%) and the mean DASH score was 35 (10 to 80). The
radiological appearances were satisfactory in most patients. Local
recurrence occurred in one patient with benign disease and two with
malignant disease. The functional outcome was thus satisfactory
at a mean follow-up in excess of five years, with a relatively low
rate of complications. The authors conclude that complex reconstructive
soft-tissue procedures may not be needed in these patients. Cite this article:
