The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) that are
performed is expected to increase. However, previous reports of
the causes of failure after TKA are limited in that they report
the causes at specific institutions, which are often dependent on
referral patterns. Our aim was to report the most common indications
for re-operations and revisions in a large series of posterior-stabilised
TKAs undertaken at a single institution, excluding referrals from
elsewhere, which may bias the causes of failure. A total of 5098 TKAs which were undertaken between 2000 and 2012
were included in the study. Re-operations, revisions with modular
component exchange, and revisions with non-modular component replacement
or removal were identified from the medical records. The mean follow-up
was five years (two to 12).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare ten-year longitudinal healthcare costs and revision rates for patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The Humana database was used to compare 2,383 patients undergoing UKA between 2007 and 2009, who were matched 1:1 from a cohort of 63,036 patients undergoing primary TKA based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Medical and surgical complications were tracked longitudinally for one year following surgery. Rates of revision surgery and cumulative mean healthcare costs were recorded for this period of time and compared between the cohorts.Aims
Methods
In this paper we make the case for the use of
single-stage revision for infected knee arthroplasty.
