With novel promising therapies potentially limiting progression of Dupuytren’s disease (DD), better patient stratification is needed. We aimed to quantify DD development and progression after seven years in a population-based cohort, and to identify factors predictive of disease development or progression. All surviving participants from our previous prevalence study were invited to participate in the current prospective cohort study. Participants were examined for presence of DD and Iselin’s classification was applied. They were asked to complete comprehensive questionnaires. Disease progression was defined as advancement to a further Iselin stage or surgery. Potential predictive factors were assessed using multivariable regression analyses. Of 763 participants in our original study, 398 were available for further investigation seven years later.Aims
Methods
In the UK, fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture is generally performed under general or regional anaesthetic, with an arm tourniquet and in a hospital setting. We have changed our practice to use local anaesthetic with adrenaline, no arm tourniquet, and perform the surgery in a community setting. We present the outcome of a consecutive series of 30 patients. Prospective data were collected for 30 patients undergoing open fasciectomy on 36 digits (six having two digits affected), over a one-year period and under the care of two surgeons. In total, 10 ml to 20 ml volume of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 adrenaline was used. A standard postoperative rehabilitation regime was used. Preoperative health scores, goniometer measurements of metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP) contractures, and Unité Rheumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scores were measured pre- and postoperatively at six and 12 weeks.Aims
Methods
The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy
of collagenase clostridium histolyticum compared with fasciectomy
and percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF) for Dupuytren’s disease. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, Web of Science,
Cochrane, Teseo and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry for clinical
trials and cohort or case-control studies which compared the clinical
outcomes and adverse effects of collagenase with those of fasciectomy
or PNF. Of 1345 articles retrieved, ten were selected. They described
the outcomes of 425 patients treated with collagenase and 418 treated
by fasciectomy or PNF. Complications were assessed using inverse-variance
weighted odds ratios (ORs). Clinical efficacy was assessed by differences
between the means for movement of the joint before and after treatment.
Dose adjustment was applied in all cases.Aims
Materials and Methods
In Canada, Dupuytren's contracture is managed
with partial fasciectomy or percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA).
Injectable collagenase will soon be available. The optimal management
of Dupuytren’s contracture is controversial and trade-offs exist
between the different methods. Using a cost-utility analysis approach,
our aim was to identify the most cost-effective form of treatment
for managing Dupuytren’s contracture it and the threshold at which
collagenase is cost-effective. We developed an expected-value decision
analysis model for Dupuytren’s contracture affecting a single finger,
comparing the cost-effectiveness of fasciectomy, aponeurotomy and collagenase
from a societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness, one-way sensitivity
and variability analyses were performed using standard thresholds
for cost effective treatment ($50 000 to $100 000/QALY gained).
Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy was the preferred strategy for
managing contractures affecting a single finger. The cost-effectiveness
of primary aponeurotomy improved when repeated to treat recurrence.
Fasciectomy was not cost-effective. Collagenase was cost-effective
relative to and preferred over aponeurotomy at $875 and $470 per
course of treatment, respectively. In summary, our model supports the trend towards non-surgical
interventions for managing Dupuytren’s contracture affecting a single
finger. Injectable collagenase will only be feasible in our publicly
funded healthcare system if it costs significantly less than current
United States pricing. Cite this article:
