We aimed to compare reoperations following distal radial fractures (DRFs) managed with early fixation versus delayed fixation following initial closed reduction (CR). We used administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, to identify DRF patients aged 18 years or older from 2003 to 2016. We used procedural and fee codes within 30 days to determine which patients underwent early fixation (≤ seven days) or delayed fixation following CR. We grouped patients in the delayed group by their time to definitive fixation (eight to 14 days, 15 to 21 days, and 22 to 30 days). We used intervention and diagnostic codes to identify reoperations within two years. We used multivariable regression to compare the association between early versus delayed fixation and reoperation for all patients and stratified by age (18 to 60 years and > 60 years).Aims
Methods
The aim of the Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial (SWIFFT) was to determine the optimal treatment for adults with a bicortical undisplaced or minimally displaced fracture of the waist of the scaphoid, comparing early surgical fixation with initial cast immobilization, with immediate fixation being offered to patients with nonunion. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to assess the relative merits of these forms of treatment. The differences in costs to the healthcare system and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of the patients over the one-year follow-up of the trial in the two treatment arms were estimated using regression analysis.Aims
Methods
We conducted an observational radiographic study
to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the AO classification
of fractures of the distal radius. Plain posteroanterior and lateral
radiographs of 456 patients with an acute fracture of the distal
radius were classified by a consultant orthopaedic hand specialist
and two specialist trainees, and the k coefficient for the inter-
and intra-observer reliability of the type, group and subgroup classification
was calculated. Only the type of fracture (A, B or C) was found to provide substantial
intra-observer reliability (k type 0.65). The inclusion
of ‘group’ and ‘subgroup’ into the classification reduced the inter-observer
reliability to fair (kgroup 0.29, ksubgroup =
0.28) and the intra-observer reliability to moderate (kgroup 0.53,
ksubgroup 0.49). Disagreement was found to arise between
specific subgroups, which may be amenable to clarification. Cite this article:
