Peri-prosthetic osteolysis and subsequent aseptic
loosening is the most common reason for revising total hip replacements.
Wear particles originating from the prosthetic components interact
with multiple cell types in the peri-prosthetic region resulting
in an inflammatory process that ultimately leads to peri-prosthetic
bone loss. These cells include macrophages, osteoclasts, osteoblasts
and fibroblasts. The majority of research in peri-prosthetic osteolysis
has concentrated on the role played by osteoclasts and macrophages.
The purpose of this review is to assess the role of the osteoblast
in peri-prosthetic osteolysis. In peri-prosthetic osteolysis, wear particles may affect osteoblasts
and contribute to the osteolytic process by two mechanisms. First,
particles and metallic ions have been shown to inhibit the osteoblast
in terms of its ability to secrete mineralised bone matrix, by reducing
calcium deposition, alkaline phosphatase activity and its ability
to proliferate. Secondly, particles and metallic ions have been
shown to stimulate osteoblasts to produce pro inflammatory mediators Cite this article:
Nanotechnology is the study, production and controlled
manipulation of materials with a grain size <
100 nm. At this
level, the laws of classical mechanics fall away and those of quantum
mechanics take over, resulting in unique behaviour of matter in
terms of melting point, conductivity and reactivity. Additionally,
and likely more significant, as grain size decreases, the ratio
of surface area to volume drastically increases, allowing for greater interaction
between implants and the surrounding cellular environment. This
favourable increase in surface area plays an important role in mesenchymal
cell differentiation and ultimately bone–implant interactions. Basic science and translational research have revealed important
potential applications for nanotechnology in orthopaedic surgery,
particularly with regard to improving the interaction between implants
and host bone. Nanophase materials more closely match the architecture
of native trabecular bone, thereby greatly improving the osseo-integration
of orthopaedic implants. Nanophase-coated prostheses can also reduce
bacterial adhesion more than conventionally surfaced prostheses.
Nanophase selenium has shown great promise when used for tumour
reconstructions, as has nanophase silver in the management of traumatic
wounds. Nanophase silver may significantly improve healing of peripheral
nerve injuries, and nanophase gold has powerful anti-inflammatory
effects on tendon inflammation. Considerable advances must be made in our understanding of the
potential health risks of production, implantation and wear patterns
of nanophase devices before they are approved for clinical use.
Their potential, however, is considerable, and is likely to benefit
us all in the future. Cite this article:
