The primary aim of this study was to determine the morbidity
of a tibial strut autograft and characterize the rate of bony union
following its use. We retrospectively assessed a series of 104 patients from a single
centre who were treated with a tibial strut autograft of > 5 cm
in length. A total of 30 had a segmental reconstruction with continuity
of bone, 27 had a segmental reconstruction without continuity of
bone, 29 had an arthrodesis and 18 had a nonunion. Donor-site morbidity
was defined as any event that required a modification of the postoperative
management. Union was assessed clinically and radiologically at
a median of 36 months (IQR, 14 to 74).Aims
Patients and Methods
Previous classification systems of failure of
limb salvage focused primarily on endoprosthetic failures and lacked sufficient
depth for the effective study of the causes of failure. In order
to address these inadequacies, the International Society of Limb
Salvage (ISOLS) formed a committee to recommend revisions of the
previous systems. The purpose of this study was to report on their
recommendations. The modifications were prepared using an earlier,
evidence-based model with subclassification based on the existing
medical literature. Subclassification for all five primary types
of failure of limb salvage following endoprosthetic reconstruction
were formulated and a complementary system was derived for the failure
of biological reconstruction. An additional classification of failure
in paediatric patients was also described. Limb salvage surgery presents a complex array of potential mechanisms
of failure, and a complete and precise classification of types of
failure is required. Earlier classification systems lacked specificity,
and the evidence-based system outlined here is designed to correct
these weaknesses and to provide a means of reporting failures of
limb salvage in order to allow the interpretation of outcome following
reconstructive surgery. Cite this article:
Internal hemipelvectomy is a standard treatment for malignant tumours of the pelvis. Reconstruction using a non-vascularised fibular graft is relatively straightforward compared to other techniques. We describe the surgical and functional outcomes for a series of ten patients who underwent an internal hemipelvectomy (type I or I/IV) with reconstruction by a non-vascularised fibular graft between 1996 and 2009. A key prerequisite for this procedure was a preserved sciatic notch, confirmed pre-operatively on MRI. Graft-host union was achieved in all patients with a single fibular graft, and in the lower graft where two grafts had been used. The mean time to union was 7.3 months (3 to 12). The upper graft did not unite in four of six cases where two grafts had been used. Seven patients were eventually able to walk without a stick. The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 75.4% (16.7 to 96.7). There were no cases of deep post-operative infection. The mean pelvic shortening was 0.9 cm (0.2 to 3.4). Recurrent tumour occurred in three cases, and death from tumour-related disease occured in one. Patients who need an internal hemipelvectomy will do well if their pelvic ring is reconstructed with a non-vascularised fibular graft. The complication rate is low, and they attain a good functional outcome.
We evaluated 31 patients who were treated with a non-vascularised fibular graft after resection of primary musculoskeletal tumours, with a median follow-up of 5.6 years (3 to 26.7 years). Primary union was achieved in 89% (41 of 46) of the grafts in a median period of 24 weeks. All 25 grafts in 18 patients without additional chemotheraphy and/or radiotherapy achieved primary union, compared with 16 of the 21 grafts (76%; 13 patients) with additional therapy (p = 0.017). Radiographs showed an increase in diameter in 70% (59) of the grafts. There were seven fatigue fractures in six patients, but only two needed treatment. Non-vascularised fibular transfer is a simpler, less expensive and a shorter procedure than the use of vascularised grafts and allows remodelling of the fibula at the donor site. It is a biological reconstruction with good long-term results, and a relatively low donor site complication rate of 16%.
