We present our experience of managing patients
with iatropathic
The primary aim of this study was to determine if delayed clavicular fixation results in a greater risk of operative complications and revision surgery. A retrospective case series was undertaken of all displaced clavicular fractures that underwent plate fixation over a ten-year period (2007 to 2017). Patient demographics, time to surgery, complications, and mode of failure were collected. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors contributing towards operative complications. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine if a potential ‘safe window’ exists from injury to delayed surgery. Propensity score matching was used to construct a case control study for comparison of risk.Aims
Patients and Methods
A total of 11 patients with combined traumatic injuries of the brachial plexus and spinal cord were reviewed retrospectively. Brachial plexus paralysis in such dual injuries tends to be diagnosed and treated late and the prognosis is usually poor. The associated injuries, which were all on the same side as the plexus lesion, were to the head (nine cases), shoulder girdle (five), thorax (nine) and upper limb (seven). These other injuries were responsible for the delayed diagnosis of brachial plexus paralysis and the poor prognosis was probably because of the delay in starting treatment and the severity of the associated injuries. When such injuries are detected in patients with spinal cord trauma, it is important to consider the possibility of involvement of the brachial plexus.
Injuries to the limb are the most frequent cause
of permanent disability following combat wounds. We reviewed the medical
records of 450 soldiers to determine the type of upper limb nerve
injuries sustained, the rate of remaining motor and sensory deficits
at final follow-up, and the type of Army disability ratings granted.
Of 189 soldiers with an injury of the upper limb, 70 had nerve-related
trauma. There were 62 men and eight women with a mean age of 25
years (18 to 49). Disabilities due to nerve injuries were associated
with loss of function, neuropathic pain or both. The mean nerve-related
disability was 26% (0% to 70%), accounting for over one-half of
this cohort’s cumulative disability. Patients injured in an explosion
had higher disability ratings than those injured by gunshot. The
ulnar nerve was most commonly injured, but most disability was associated
with radial nerve trauma. In terms of the final outcome, at military
discharge 59 subjects (84%) experienced persistent weakness, 48
(69%) had a persistent sensory deficit and 17 (24%) experienced
chronic pain from scar-related or neuropathic pain. Nerve injury
was the cause of frequent and substantial disability in our cohort
of wounded soldiers. Cite this article:
To analyse the influence of upper extremity trauma on the long-term
outcome of polytraumatised patients. A total of 629 multiply injured patients were included in a follow-up
study at least ten years after injury (mean age 26.5 years, standard
deviation 12.4). The extent of the patients’ injury was classified
using the Injury Severity Score. Outcome was measured using the
Hannover Score for Polytrauma Outcome (HASPOC), Short Form (SF)-12, rehabilitation
duration, and employment status. Outcomes for patients with and
without a fracture of the upper extremity were compared and analysed
with regard to specific fracture regions and any additional brachial
plexus lesion.Aims
Patients and Methods
Gunshot injuries to the shoulder are rare and
difficult to manage. We present a case series of seven patients
who sustained a severe shoulder injury to the non-dominant side
as a result of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. We describe the injury
as ‘suicide shoulder’ caused by upward and outward movement of the
gun barrel as the trigger is pulled. All patients were male, with
a mean age of 32 years (21 to 48). All were treated at the time
of injury with initial repeated debridement, and within four weeks
either by hemiarthroplasty (four patients) or arthrodesis (three patients).
The hemiarthroplasty failed in one patient after 20 years due to
infection and an arthrodesis was attempted, which also failed due
to infection. Overall follow-up was for a mean of 26 months (12
to 44). All four hemiarthroplasty implants were removed with no
feasible reconstruction ultimately possible, resulting in a poor functional
outcome and no return to work. In contrast, all three primary arthrodeses
eventually united, with two patients requiring revision plating
and grafting. These patients returned to work with a good functional
outcome. We recommend arthrodesis rather than replacement as the
treatment of choice for this challenging injury. Cite this article:
