The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes. Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has been performed. . In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound (Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics were also used in all groups. After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%) patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up, respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication rate. Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:845–50

We have developed a bioactive bone cement (BA cement) consisting of Bis-GMA resin and bioactive glass powder. It has high compressive and tensile strengths, a low curing temperature and its bioactivity allows it to bond directly with bone. We operated on the 18 femora of nine mongrel dogs for intercalary replacement of part of the bone by a metal prosthesis using either PMMA cement or BA cement for fixation. Three dogs were killed at each of 4, 12 and 26 weeks after surgery for the evaluation of fixation strength by a push-out test and for histological examination by Giemsa surface staining and SEM. Fixation strengths with PMMA cement at 4, 12 and 26 weeks after surgery were 46.8 ± 18.9, 50.0 ± 24.7, and 58.2 ± 28.9 kgf (mean ±SD), respectively. Those with BA cement were 56.8 ± 26.1, 67.2 ± 19.2, and 72.8 ± 22.2 kgf, respectively. Fibrous tissue intervened between bone and PMMA cement but BA cement had bonded directly to bone at 12 and 26 weeks. This suggests that BA cement will be useful in providing long-lasting fixation of implants to bone under weight-bearing conditions