The anterior cruciate ligament was replaced in rabbits, using implants of carbon or polyester filaments with known mechanical properties. The biocompatibility of the implants was assessed in detail using light microscopy, and scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Mechanical tests were made of stability, in comparison with normal joints and controls after excision of the ligament. Some carbon fibre implants broke down in vivo, allowing instability; the fragments caused chronic inflammation. Intact carbon implants did not induce the formation of neoligaments; they were covered by tissue, but there was no ingrowth. Polyester did not degrade mechanically and supported early collagenous ingrowth within the implant, even in the mid-joint space. It was concluded that there was no justification for the use of carbon fibres as
We report the two- to four-year results following the insertion of the Leeds-Keio prosthetic ligament for chronic anterior cruciate deficiency. Virtually all the 20 patients were less disabled by instability, but objective results were good or excellent in only two-thirds and under anaesthesia the pivot shift sign was still positive in half. Arthroscopic and histological assessment in 16 patients failed to show the development of a functional neoligament, and the common appearance of a synovitic reaction to polyester particles gave concern.
The anteroposterior stability of cadaveric knees was investigated. There was a wide range of normal laxity; knees were more stable at 90 degrees than at 20 degrees flexion. Anterior cruciate ligament implants with different stiffnesses were inserted; normal stability could always be restored, and the stiffness or extensibility of implants did not affect knee behaviour significantly. The tightness of implants was critical--small tensioning errors caused subluxation, inhibited knee extension and allowed damagingly high implant tensions. It is concluded that the tension of ligament implants could not be adjusted simply with a pre-set instrument; the procedure will remain critically dependent on the judgment of the operating surgeon.
We excised the anterior cruciate ligament from the left stifle of 24 sheep and replaced it by a polyester fibre implant routed 'over the top' of the femoral condyle and fixed, using grommets and screws. All the joints were sound, and the animals moved normally until they were killed at six, 12 and 24 months after operation. We found that the implants were always covered by host tissue, which matured into bundles with a histological appearance similar to the natural ligament. The implants were joined to the bones by organised fibrous tissue and there was no anchorage loosening. There was no synovitis, but the operated joints showed progressive cartilage degeneration. The reconstructed joints became less stable immediately after operation, but regained normal stability as the neoligaments developed. The neoligaments lost strength with time, despite tissue ingrowth. The good functional, biomechanical, and histological results justify clinical trials of this type of implant.
The biomechanical function of the anteromedial
(AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament
(ACL) remains controversial. Some studies report that the AM bundle
stabilises the knee joint in anteroposterior (AP) translation and
rotational movement (both internal and external) to the same extent
as the PL bundle. Others conclude that the PL bundle is more important
than the AM in controlling rotational movement. The objective of this randomised cohort study involving 60 patients
(39 men and 21 women) with a mean age of 32.9 years (18 to 53) was
to evaluate the function of the AM and the PL bundles of the ACL
in both AP and rotational movements of the knee joint after single-bundle
and double-bundle ACL reconstruction using a computer navigation
system. In the double-bundle group the patients were also randomised
to have the AM or the PL bundle tensioned first, with knee laxity
measured after each stage of reconstruction. All patients had isolated
complete ACL tears, and the presence of a meniscal injury was the
only supplementary pathology permitted for inclusion in the trial.
The KT-1000 arthrometer was used to apply a constant load to evaluate
the AP translation and the rolimeter was used to apply a constant
rotational force. For the single-bundle group deviation was measured
before and after ACL reconstruction. In the double-bundle group
deviation was measured for the ACL-deficient, AM- or PL-reconstructed
first conditions and for the total reconstruction. We found that the AM bundle in the double-bundle group controlled
rotation as much as the single-bundle technique, and to a greater
extent than the PL bundle in the double-bundle technique. The double-bundle
technique increases AP translation and rotational stability in internal
rotation more than the single-bundle technique.