Stems improve the mechanical stability of tibial
components in total knee replacement (TKR), but come at a cost of stress
shielding along their length. Their advantages include resistance
to shear, reduced tibial lift-off and increased stability by reducing
micromotion. Longer stems may have disadvantages including stress
shielding along the length of the stem with associated reduction
in bone density and a theoretical risk of subsidence and loosening, peri-prosthetic
fracture and end-of-stem pain. These features make long stems unattractive
in the primary TKR setting, but often desirable in revision surgery
with bone loss and instability. In the revision scenario, stems
are beneficial in order to convey structural stability to the construct
and protect the reconstruction of bony defects. Cemented and uncemented
long stemmed implants have different roles depending on the nature
of the bone loss involved. This review discusses the biomechanics of the
Aims. The use of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) components has increased during the past decade. The initial
Aims. Loosening of components after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with the development of radiolucent lines (RLLs). The aim of this study was to assess the rate of formation of RLLs in the cemented original
Aims. The risk of mechanical failure of modular revision hip stems is frequently mentioned in the literature, but little is currently known about the actual clinical failure rates of this type of prosthesis. The current retrospective long-term analysis examines the distal and modular failure patterns of the Prevision hip stem from 18 years of clinical use. A
Aims. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a highly congruent condylar-stabilized (CS) articulation may be advantageous due to increased stability versus cruciate-retaining (CR) designs, while mitigating the limitations of a posterior-stabilized construct. The aim was to assess ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of a cemented single-radius TKA with a CS insert, performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice. Methods. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing TKA at a specialist centre in the UK between November 2010 and December 2012. Data were collected using a bespoke electronic database and cross-referenced with national arthroplasty audit data, with variables including: preoperative characteristics, intraoperative factors, complications, and mortality status. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected by a specialist research team at ten years post-surgery. There were 536 TKAs, of which 308/536 (57.5%) were in female patients. The mean age was 69.0 years (95% CI 45.0 to 88.0), the mean BMI was 32.2 kg/m. 2. (95% CI 18.9 to 50.2), and 387/536 (72.2%) survived to ten years. There were four revisions (0.7%): two deep infections (requiring debridement and implant retention), one aseptic loosening, and one haemosiderosis. Results. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in implant survival according to sex, age, or obesity status. Ten-year PROMs were available for 196/387 (50.6%) surviving patients and were excellent: mean Oxford Knee Score 34.4 (95% CI 32.7 to 36.1); mean Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 51.2 (95% CI 16.1 to 86.3); mean EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire score 69.9 (95% CI 46.8 to 93.0); 141/196 (71.9%) achieved the 22-point FJS patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS); and 156/196 (79.6%) were “very satisfied or satisfied”. Conclusion. This is the only large study reporting ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of TKA using a cemented single-radius
Aims. Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses are
Polished taper-slip (PTS) cemented stems have an excellent clinical track record and are the most common stem type used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the UK. Due to low rates of aseptic loosening, they have largely replaced more traditional composite beam (CB) cemented stems. However, there is now emerging evidence from multiple joint registries that PTS stems are associated with higher rates of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF) compared to their CB stem counterparts. The risk of both intraoperative and postoperative PFF remains greater with uncemented stems compared to either of these cemented stem subtypes. PFF continues to be a devastating complication following primary THA and is associated with high complication and mortality rates. Recent efforts have focused on identifying implant-related risk factors for PFF in order to guide preventative strategies, and therefore the purpose of this article is to present the current evidence on the effect of cemented femoral stem
We scanned 25 left knees in healthy human subjects
using MRI. Multiplanar reconstruction software was used to take
measurements of the inferior and posterior facets of the femoral
condyles and the trochlea. A ‘basic circle’ can be defined which, in the sagittal plane,
fits the posterior and inferior facets of the lateral condyle, the
posterior facet of the medial condyle and the floor of the groove
of the trochlea. It also approximately fits both condyles in the
coronal plane (inferior facets) and the axial plane (posterior facets).
The circle fitting the inferior facet of the medial condyle in the
sagittal plane was consistently 35% larger than the other circles
and was termed the ‘medial inferior circle’. There were strong correlations
between the radii of the circles, the relative positions of the
centres of the condyles, the width of the condyles, the total knee
width and skeletal measurements including height. There was poor
correlation between the radii of the circles and the position of
the trochlea relative to the condyles. In summary, the condyles are approximately spherical except for
the inferior facet medially, which has a larger radius in the sagittal
plane. The size and position of the condyles are consistent and
change with the size of the person. However, the position of the
trochlea is variable even though its radius is similar to that of
the condyles. This information has implications for understanding
anterior knee pain and for the
Aims. Custom flange acetabular components (CFACs) are a patient-specific option for addressing large acetabular defects at revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), but patient and implant characteristics that affect survivorship remain unknown. This study aimed to identify patient and
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an established
and successful procedure. However, the
Instability after arthroplasty of the shoulder
is difficult to correct surgically. Soft-tissue procedures and revision surgery
using unconstrained anatomical components are associated with a
high rate of failure. The purpose of this study was to determine
the results of revision of an unstable anatomical shoulder arthroplasty
to a reverse
National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines
state that cemented stems with an Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel
(ODEP) rating of >
3B should be used for hemiarthroplasty when treating
an intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. These recommendations
are based on studies in which most, if not all stems, did not hold
such a rating. . This case-control study compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty
using a cemented (Exeter) or uncemented (Corail) femoral stem. These
are the two prostheses most commonly used in hip arthroplasty in
the UK. Data were obtained from two centres; most patients had undergone
hemiarthroplasty using a cemented Exeter stem (n = 292/412). Patients
were matched for all factors that have been shown to influence mortality
after an intracapsular fracture of the neck of the femur. Outcome
measures included: complications, re-operations and mortality rates
at two, seven, 30 and 365 days post-operatively. Comparable outcomes
for the two stems were seen. . There were more intra-operative complications in the uncemented
group (13% vs 0%), but the cemented group had a
greater mortality in the early post-operative period (n = 6). There
was no overall difference in the rate of re-operation (5%) or death
(365 days: 26%) between the two groups at any time post-operatively. This study therefore supports the use of both cemented and uncemented
stems of proven
Femoral revision component subsidence has been identified as predicting early failure in revision hip surgery. This comparative cohort study assessed the potential risk factors of subsidence in two commonly used femoral implant designs. A comparative cohort study was undertaken, analyzing a consecutive series of patients following revision total hip arthroplasties using either a tapered-modular (TM) fluted titanium or a porous-coated cylindrical modular (PCM) titanium femoral component, between April 2006 and May 2018. Clinical and radiological assessment was compared for both treatment cohorts. Risk factors for subsidence were assessed and compared.Aims
Methods
Cemented femoral stems with force closed fixation
designs have shown good clinical results despite high early subsidence.
A new triple-tapered stem in this category (C-stem AMT) was introduced
in 2005. This study compares this new stem with an established stem
of similar
CT and advanced computer-aided
We undertook a review of the literature relating to the two basic stem designs in use in cemented hip replacement, namely loaded tapers or force-closed femoral stems, and the composite beam or shape-closed designs. The associated stem fixation theory as understood from in vitro studies and finite element modelling were examined with reference to the survivorship results for each of the concepts of fixation. It is clear that both
The mechanisms controlling and limiting movement and serving to transmit load between the femur and the tibia are discussed. Having accounted for the transmission of all components of force and couple across the joint and noted the load-bearing role of the menisci, some principles which might guide the
The primary objective of this study was to compare migration of the cemented ATTUNE fixed bearing cruciate retaining tibial component with the cemented Press-Fit Condylar (PFC)-sigma fixed bearing cruciate retaining tibial component. The secondary objectives included comparing clinical and radiological outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). A single blinded randomized, non-inferiority study was conducted including 74 patients. Radiostereometry examinations were made after weight bearing, but before hospital discharge, and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. PROMS were collected preoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Radiographs for measuring radiolucencies were collected at two weeks and two years postoperatively.Aims
Methods
We present the 10- to 17-year results of 112 computer-assisted
The articular surface of the humeral head is usually described as facing posteromedially, making an angle of between 16 degrees and 35 degrees with the transepicondylar plane. At hemiarthroplasty the articular surface also appears to be offset posteriorly with respect to the humeral shaft. Coracoid impingement may occur if this offset is not accommodated. An analysis was made of 29 cadaveric humeri using an industrial co-ordinate measuring machine. The position of the centre of the head was defined with respect to the humeral shaft and transepicondylar plane. The humeral articular surface was found to be retroverted by 21.4 degrees and its centre offset posteriorly by 4.7 mm. Previous interpretation of retroversion did not take into account the posterior displacement, and this may be of importance in improving future prosthetic