Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). As revision of UKA may be less technically demanding than revision TKA, UKA patients with poor functional outcomes may be more likely to be offered revision than TKA patients with similar outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical thresholds for revisions between TKA and UKA using revision incidence and patient-reported outcomes, in a large, matched cohort at early, mid-, and late-term follow-up. Analyses were performed on propensity score-matched patient cohorts of TKAs and UKAs (2:1) registered in the New Zealand Joint Registry between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2019 with an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) response at six months (n, TKA: 16,774; UKA: 8,387), five years (TKA: 6,718; UKA: 3,359), or ten years (TKA: 3,486; UKA: 1,743). Associations between OKS and revision within two years following the score were examined. Thresholds were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Reasons for aseptic revision were compared using cumulative incidence with competing risk.Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has a higher risk of revision than total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly for younger patients. The outcome of knee arthroplasty is typically defined as implant survival or revision incidence after a defined number of years. This can be difficult for patients to conceptualize. We aimed to calculate the ‘lifetime risk’ of revision for UKA as a more meaningful estimate of risk projection over a patient’s remaining lifetime, and to compare this to TKA. Incidence of revision and mortality for all primary UKAs performed from 1999 to 2019 (n = 13,481) was obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). Lifetime risk of revision was calculated for patients and stratified by age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade.Aims
Methods
This systematic review aims to compare the precision of component positioning, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, survivorship, cost-effectiveness, and learning curves of MAKO robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) with manual medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA). Searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were performed in November 2021 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included “robotic”, “unicompartmental”, “knee”, and “arthroplasty”. Published clinical research articles reporting the learning curves and cost-effectiveness of MAKO RAUKA, and those comparing the component precision, functional outcomes, survivorship, or complications with mUKA, were included for analysis.Aims
Methods
The success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually measured using functional outcome scores and revision-free survivorship. However, reporting the lifetime risk of revision may be more meaningful to patients when gauging risks, especially in younger patients. We aimed to assess the lifetime risk of revision for patients in different age categories at the time of undergoing primary TKA. The New Zealand Joint Registry database was used to obtain revision rates, mortality, and the indications for revision for all primary TKAs performed during an 18-year period between January 1999 and December 2016. Patients were stratified into age groups at the time of the initial TKA, and the lifetime risk of revision was calculated according to age, sex, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade. The most common indications for revision were also analyzed for each age group.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal important change (MIC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) according to patient satisfaction six months following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a UK population. During a one-year period, 461 patients underwent a primary THA and completed preoperative and six-month FJS, with a mean age of 67.2 years (22 to 93). At six months, patient satisfaction was recorded as very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The difference between patients recording neutral (n = 31) and satisfied (n = 101) was used to define the MCID. MIC for a cohort was defined as the change in the FJS for those patients declaring their outcome as satisfied, whereas receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the MIC for an individual and the PASS. Distribution-based methodology was used to calculate the MDC.Aims
Methods
Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful procedure, about 20% of patients remain dissatisfied postoperatively. This proportion is derived from dichotomous models of the assessment of surgical success or failure, which may not reflect the spectrum of outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore differing responses to surgery, and assess whether there are distinct groups of patients with differing patterns of outcome. This was a secondary analysis of a UK multicentre TKA longitudinal cohort study. We used a group-based trajectory modelling analysis of Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in the first year following surgery with longitudinal data involving five different timepoints and multiple predictor variables. Associations between the derived trajectory groups and categorical baseline variables were assessed, and predictors of trajectory group membership were identified using Poisson regression and multinomial logistic regression, as appropriate. The final model was adjusted for sociodemographic factors (age, sex) and baseline OKS.Aims
Methods
The aims of this systematic review were to assess the learning curve of semi-active robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), and to compare the accuracy, patient-reported functional outcomes, complications, and survivorship between rTHA and manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA). Searches of PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar were performed in April 2020 in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included “robotic”, “hip”, and “arthroplasty”. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical research articles reporting the learning curve for rTHA (robotic arm-assisted only) and those comparing the implantation accuracy, functional outcomes, survivorship, or complications with mTHA.Aims
Methods
Joint registries typically use revision of an implant as an endpoint and report survival rates after a defined number of years. However, reporting lifetime risk of revision may be more meaningful, especially in younger patients. We aimed to assess lifetime risk of revision for patients in defined age groups at the time of primary surgery. The New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) was used to obtain rates and causes of revision for all primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed between January 1999 and December 2016. The NZJR is linked to the New Zealand Registry of Births, Deaths and Marriages to obtain complete and accurate data. Patients were stratified by age at primary surgery, and lifetime risk of revision calculated according to age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. The most common causes for revision were also analyzed for each age group.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to assess the independent association of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative mortality for patients undergoing orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The secondary aim was to identify factors that were associated with developing COVID-19 during the postoperative period. A multicentre retrospective study was conducted of all patients presenting to nine centres over a 50-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 March 2020 to 19 April 2020) with a minimum of 50 days follow-up. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, priority (urgent or elective), procedure type, COVID-19 status, and postoperative mortality were recorded.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to develop a personalized outcome prediction tool, to be used with knee arthroplasty patients, that predicts outcomes (lengths of stay (LOS), 90 day readmission, and one-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on an individual basis and allows for dynamic modifiable risk factors. Data were prospectively collected on all patients who underwent total or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a between July 2015 and June 2018. Cohort 1 (n = 5,958) was utilized to develop models for LOS and 90 day readmission. Cohort 2 (n = 2,391, surgery date 2015 to 2017) was utilized to develop models for one-year improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) pain score, KOOS function score, and KOOS quality of life (QOL) score. Model accuracies within the imputed data set were assessed through cross-validation with root mean square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors (MAEs) for the LOS and PROMs models, and the index of prediction accuracy (IPA), and area under the curve (AUC) for the readmission models. Model accuracies in new patient data sets were assessed with AUC.Aims
Methods
There are comparatively few randomized studies evaluating knee arthroplasty prostheses, and fewer still that report longer-term functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcomes of an existing implant trial cohort to document changing patient function over time following total knee arthroplasty using longitudinal analytical techniques and to determine whether implant design chosen at time of surgery influenced these outcomes. A mid-term follow-up of the remaining 125 patients from a randomized cohort of total knee arthroplasty patients (initially comprising 212 recruited patients), comparing modern (Triathlon) and traditional (Kinemax) prostheses was undertaken. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), knee range of movement, pain numerical rating scales, lower limb power output, timed functional assessment battery, and satisfaction survey. Data were linked to earlier assessment timepoints, and analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) mixed models, incorporating longitudinal change over all assessment timepoints.Aims
Methods
Aims
Patients and Methods
The intra-articular administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) has
been shown to be effective in reducing blood loss in unicompartmental
knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate reconstruction. The effects
on human articular cartilage, however, remains unknown. Our aim,
in this study, was to investigate any detrimental effect of TXA
on chondrocytes, and to establish if there was a safe dose for its
use in clinical practice. The hypothesis was that TXA would cause
a dose-dependent damage to human articular cartilage. The cellular morphology, adhesion, metabolic activity, and viability
of human chondrocytes when increasing the concentration (0 mg/ml
to 40 mg/ml) and length of exposure to TXA (0 to 12 hours) were
analyzed in a 2D model. This was then repeated, excluding cellular
adhesion, in a 3D model and confirmed in viable samples of articular cartilage.Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for prosthetic
joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The New Zealand Joint Registry database was analysed, using revision
surgery for PJI at six and 12 months after surgery as primary outcome
measures. Statistical associations between revision for infection,
with common and definable surgical and patient factors were tested.Aims
Patients and Methods
Instability is a common indication for early
revision after both primary and revision total knee arthroplasty
(TKA), accounting for up to 20% in the literature. The number of
TKAs performed annually continues to climb exponentially, thus having
an effective algorithm for treatment is essential. This relies on
a thorough pre- and intra-operative assessment of the patient. The
underlying cause of the instability must be identified initially
and subsequently, the surgeon must be able to balance the flexion
and extension gaps and be comfortable using a variety of constrained
implants. This review describes the assessment of the unstable TKA, and
the authors’ preferred form of treatment for these difficult cases
where the source of instability is often multifactorial. Cite this article:
We investigated the changes seen on serial metal
artefact reduction magnetic resonance imaging scans (MARS-MRI) of
metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (MoM THAs). In total 155
THAs, in 35 male and 100 female patients (mean age 70.4 years, 42
to 91), underwent at least two MRI scans at a mean interval of 14.6
months (2.6 to 57.1), at a mean of 48.2 months (3.5 to 93.3) after
primary hip surgery. Scans were graded using a modification of the
Oxford classification. Progression of disease was defined as an
increase in grade or a minimum 10% increase in fluid lesion volume
at second scan. A total of 16 hips (30%) initially classified as
‘normal’ developed an abnormality on the second scan. Of those with
‘isolated trochanteric fluid’ 9 (47%) underwent disease progression,
as did 7 (58%) of ‘effusions’. A total of 54 (77%) of hips initially
classified as showing adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) progressed,
with higher rates of progression in higher grades. Disease progression
was associated with high blood cobalt levels or an irregular pseudocapsule
lining at the initial scan. There was no association with changes
in functional scores. Adverse reactions to metal debris in MoM THAs
may not be as benign as previous reports have suggested. Close radiological
follow-up is recommended, particularly in high-risk groups. Cite this article:
Sciatic nerve palsy following total hip arthroplasty
(THA) is a relatively rare yet potentially devastating complication.
The purpose of this case series was to report the results of patients
with a sciatic nerve palsy who presented between 2000 and 2010,
following primary and revision THA and were treated with neurolysis.
A retrospective review was made of 12 patients (eight women and
four men), with sciatic nerve palsy following THA. The mean age
of the patients was 62.7 years (50 to 72; standard deviation 6.9).
They underwent interfascicular neurolysis for sciatic nerve palsy,
after failing a trial of non-operative treatment for a minimum of
six months. Following surgery, a statistically and clinically significant
improvement in motor function was seen in all patients. The mean
peroneal nerve score function improved from 0.42 (0 to 3) to 3 (1
to 5) (p <
0.001). The mean tibial nerve motor function score
improved from 1.75 (1 to 4) to 3.92 (3 to 5) (p = 0.02).The mean
improvement in sensory function was a clinically negligible 1 out
of 5 in all patients. In total, 11 patients reported improvement
in their pain following surgery. We conclude that neurolysis of the sciatic nerve has a favourable
prognosis in patients with a sciatic nerve palsy following THA.
Our findings suggest that surgery should not be delayed for >
12
months following injury. Cite this article:
Although the vast majority of patients that undergo
total knee replacement have satisfactory outcomes with a generally
low complication rate, occasionally a patient will be encountered
that has had multiple failed surgeries, and now reaches a crossroad
as to whether limb salvage will be acceptable or not. Cite this article:
The aim of this prospective multicentre study
was to report the patient satisfaction after total knee replacement (TKR),
undertaken with the aid of intra-operative sensors, and to compare
these results with previous studies. A total of 135 patients undergoing
TKR were included in the study. The soft-tissue balance of each
TKR was quantified intra-operatively by the sensor, and 18 (13%)
were found to be unbalanced. A total of 113 patients (96.7%) in
the balanced group and 15 (82.1%) in the unbalanced group were satisfied
or very satisfied one year post-operatively (p = 0.043). A review of the literature identified no previous study with
a mean level of satisfaction that was greater than the reported
level of satisfaction of the balanced TKR group in this study. Ensuring
soft-tissue balance by using intra-operative sensors during TKR
may improve satisfaction. Cite this article:
We have previously reported the short-term radiological
results of a randomised controlled trial comparing kinematically
aligned total knee replacement (TKR) and mechanically aligned TKR,
along with early pain and function scores. In this study we report
the two-year clinical results from this trial. A total of 88 patients
(88 knees) were randomly allocated to undergo either kinematically
aligned TKR using patient-specific guides, or mechanically aligned
TKR using conventional instruments. They were analysed on an intention-to-treat
basis. The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded to the
method of alignment. At a minimum of two years, all outcomes were better for the kinematically
aligned group, as determined by the mean Oxford knee score (40 (15
to 48) In this study, the use of a kinematic alignment technique performed
with patient-specific guides provided better pain relief and restored
better function and range of movement than the mechanical alignment
technique performed with conventional instruments. Cite this article:
