The aims of this study were to validate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds for Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores following arthroscopic Bankart repair, and to identify preoperative threshold values of these scores that could predict the achievement of MCID and PASS. A retrospective review was conducted on 131 consecutive patients with anterior shoulder instability who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between January 2020 and January 2023. Inclusion criteria required at least one episode of shoulder instability and a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Preoperative and one-year postoperative scores were assessed. MCID and PASS were estimated using distribution-based and anchor-based methods, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis determined preoperative patient-reported outcome measure thresholds predictive of achieving MCID and PASS.Aims
Methods
Hip arthroscopy has gained prominence as a primary surgical intervention for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to identify radiological features, and their combinations, that predict the outcome of hip arthroscopy for FAI. A prognostic cross-sectional cohort study was conducted involving patients from a single centre who underwent hip arthroscopy between January 2013 and April 2021. Radiological metrics measured on conventional radiographs and magnetic resonance arthrography were systematically assessed. The study analyzed the relationship between these metrics and complication rates, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes.Aims
Methods
Aims. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults. There remains a lack of consensus regarding whether intra-articular procedures such as
Aims. Hip arthroscopy (HA) has become the treatment of choice for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). However, less favourable outcomes following arthroscopic surgery are expected in patients with severe chondral lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of HA in patients with FAI and associated chondral lesions, classified according to the Outerbridge system. Methods. A systematic search was performed on four databases. Studies which involved HA as the primary management of FAI and reported on chondral lesions as classified according to the Outerbridge classification were included. The study was registered on PROSPERO. Demographic data, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were collected. Results. A total of 24 studies were included with a total of 3,198 patients (3,233 hips). Patients had significantly less improvement in PROMs if they had Outerbridge grade III and IV lesions (p = 0.012). Compared with microfracture, autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) resulted in significantly reduced rates of conversion to THA (p = 0.042) and of revision arthroscopy (p = 0.038). Chondral repair procedures in these patients also did not significantly reduce the rates of conversion to THA (p = 0.931), or of revision arthroscopy (p = 0.218). However, compared with microfracture, AMIC significantly reduced the rates of conversion to THA (p = 0.001) and of revision arthroscopy (p = 0.011) in these patients. Those with Outerbridge grade III and IV lesions also had significantly increased rates of conversion to THA (p = 0.029) and of revision arthroscopy (p = 0.023) if they had associated lesions of the acetabulum and femoral head. Those who underwent labral debridement had a significantly increased rate of conversion to THA compared with those who underwent
This study reports mid-term outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) exclusively in a borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) population to provide a contrast to published outcomes for arthroscopic surgery of the hip in BHD. We identified 42 hips in 40 patients treated between January 2009 and January 2016 with BHD defined as a lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) of ≥ 18° but < 25°. A minimum five-year follow-up was available. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) including Tegner score, subjective hip value (SHV), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were assessed. The following morphological parameters were evaluated: LCEA, acetabular index (AI), α angle, Tönnis staging, acetabular retroversion, femoral version, femoroepiphyseal acetabular roof index (FEAR), iliocapsularis to rectus femoris ratio (IC/RF), and labral and ligamentum teres (LT) pathology.Aims
Methods
There has been a marked increase in the number of hip arthroscopies performed over the past 16 years, primarily in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Insights into the pathoanatomy of FAI, and high-level evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopy in the management of FAI, have fuelled this trend. Arthroscopic management of labral tears with repair may have superior results compared with debridement, and there is now emerging evidence to support reconstructive options where repair is not possible. In situations where an interportal capsulotomy is performed to facilitate access, data now support closure of the capsule in selective cases where there is an increased risk of postoperative instability. Preoperative planning is an integral component of bony corrective surgery in FAI, and this has evolved to include computer-planned resection. However, the benefit of this remains controversial. Hip instability is now widely accepted, and diagnostic criteria and treatment are becoming increasingly refined. Instability can also be present with FAI or develop as a result of FAI treatment. In this annotation, we outline major current controversies relating to decision-making in hip arthroscopy for FAI. Cite this article:
We aimed to address the question on whether there is a place for shoulder stabilization surgery in patients who had voluntary posterior instability starting in childhood and adolescence, and later becoming involuntary and uncontrollable. Consecutive patients who had an operation for recurrent posterior instability before the age of 18 years were studied retrospectively. All patients had failed conservative treatment for at least six months prior to surgery; and no patients had psychiatric disorders. Two groups were identified and compared: voluntary posterior instability starting in childhood which became uncontrollable and involuntary (group VBI); and involuntary posterior instability (group I). Patients were reviewed and assessed at least two years after surgery by two examiners.Aims
Methods
Responsiveness and ceiling effects are key properties of an outcome score. No such data have been reported for the original English version of the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) at a follow-up of more than four months. The aim of this study was to identify the responsiveness and ceiling effects of the English version iHOT-12 in a series of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for intra-articular hip pathology at a minimum of one year postoperatively. A total of 171 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with a diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) under the care of a single surgeon between January 2013 and March 2017 were included. iHOT-12 and EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) scores were available pre- and postoperatively. Effect size and ceiling effects for the iHOT-12 were calculated with subgroup analysis.Aims
Methods
A borderline dysplastic hip can behave as either stable or unstable and this makes surgical decision making challenging. While an unstable hip may be best treated by acetabular reorientation, stable hips can be treated arthroscopically. Several imaging parameters can help to identify the appropriate treatment, including the Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) index, measured on plain radiographs. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and the sensitivity of FEAR index on MRI compared with its radiological measurement. The technique of measuring the FEAR index on MRI was defined and its reliability validated. A retrospective study assessed three groups of 20 patients: an unstable group of ‘borderline dysplastic hips’ with lateral centre edge angle (LCEA) less than 25° treated successfully by periacetabular osteotomy; a stable group of ‘borderline dysplastic hips’ with LCEA less than 25° treated successfully by impingement surgery; and an asymptomatic control group with LCEA between 25° and 35°. The following measurements were performed on both standardized radiographs and on MRI: LCEA, acetabular index, femoral anteversion, and FEAR index.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiological measurements, and total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survival in patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for mild, moderate, or severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. We performed a retrospective study involving 336 patients (420 hips) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon at an academic centre. After exclusions, 124 patients (149 hips) were included. The preoperative lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) was used to classify the severity of dysplasia: 18° to 25° was considered mild (n = 20), 10° to 17° moderate (n = 66), and < 10° severe (n = 63). There was no difference in patient characteristics between the groups (all, p > 0.05). Pre- and postoperative radiological measurements were made. The National Institute of Health’s Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) outcome measures (physical function computerized adaptive test (PF CAT), Global Physical and Mental Health Scores) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to THA or PF CAT scores < 40, and was assessed with Kaplan–Meier analysis. The mean follow-up was five years (2 to 10) ending in either failure or the latest contact with the patient.Aims
Patients and Methods
The factors that predispose to recurrent instability and revision
stabilization procedures after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior
glenohumeral instability remain unclear. We sought to determine
the rate and risk factors associated with ongoing instability in
patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair for instability
of the shoulder. We used the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System
(SPARCS) database to identify patients with a diagnosis of anterior
instability of the shoulder undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair
between 2003 and 2011. Patients were followed for a minimum of three
years. Baseline demographics and subsequent further surgery to the ipsilateral
shoulder were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify
independent risk factors for recurrent instability.Aims
Materials and Methods
Joint-preserving surgery of the hip (JPSH) has evolved considerably
and now includes a number of procedures, including arthroscopy,
surgical dislocation, and redirectional osteotomies of the femur
and acetabulum. There are a number of different factors which lead
to failure of JPSH. Consequently, it is of interest to assess the
various modes of failure in order to continue to identify best practice
and the indications for these procedures. Using a retrospective observational study design, we reviewed
1013 patients who had undergone JPSH by a single surgeon between
2005 and 2015. There were 509 men and 504 women with a mean age
of 39 years (16 to 78). Of the 1013 operations, 783 were arthroscopies,
122 surgical dislocations, and 108 peri-acetabular osteotomies (PAO).
We analysed the overall failure rates and modes of failure. Re-operations
were categorised into four groups: Mode 1 was arthritis progression
or organ failure leading to total hip arthroplasty (THA); Mode 2
was an Incorrect diagnosis/procedure; Mode 3 resulted from malcorrection
of femur (type A), acetabulum (type B), or labrum (type C) and Mode 4
resulted from an unintended consequence of the initial surgical
intervention.Aims
Patients and Methods
A variety of operative techniques have been described as under
the term ‘Bristow-Latarjet’ procedure. This review aims to define
the original procedure, and compare the variation in techniques
described in the literature, assessing any effect on clinical outcomes. A systematic review of 24 studies was performed to compare specific
steps of the technique (coracoid osteotomy site, subscapularis approach,
orientation and position of coracoid graft fixation and fixation
method, additional labral and capsular repair) and detect any effect
this variability had on outcomes.Objectives
Materials and Methods
The acetabular labrum is a soft-tissue structure
which lines the acetabular rim of the hip joint. Its role in hip
joint biomechanics and joint health has been of particular interest
over the past decade. In normal hip joint biomechanics, the labrum
is crucial in retaining a layer of pressurised intra-articular fluid
for joint lubrication and load support/distribution. Its seal around
the femoral head is further regarded as a contributing to hip stability through
its suction effect. The labrum itself is also important in increasing
contact area thereby reducing contact stress. Given the labrum’s
role in normal hip joint biomechanics, surgical techniques for managing
labral damage are continuously evolving as our understanding of
its anatomy and function continue to progress. The current paper
aims to review the anatomy and biomechanical function of the labrum
and how they are affected by differing surgical techniques. Take home message: The acetabular labrum plays a critical role
in hip function and maintaining and restoring its function during
surgical intervention remain an essential goal. Cite this article:
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) may
lead to symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We report our
experience of arthroscopic treatment, including osteochondroplasty,
for the sequelae of SCFE. Data were prospectively collected on patients undergoing arthroscopy
of the hip for the sequelae of SCFE between March 2007 and February
2013, including demographic data, radiological assessment of the
deformity and other factors that may influence outcome, such as
the presence of established avascular necrosis. Patients completed
the modified Harris hip score (mHHS) and the non-arthritic hip score
(NAHS) before and after surgery. In total, 18 patients with a mean age of 19 years (13 to 42),
were included in the study. All patients presented with pain in
the hip and mechanical symptoms, and had evidence of FAI (cam or
mixed impingement) on plain radiographs. The patients underwent arthroscopic osteoplasty of the femoral
neck. The mean follow-up was 29 months (23 to 56). The mean mHHS and NAHS scores improved from 56.2 (27.5 to 100.1)
and 52.1 (12.5 to 97.5) pre-operatively to 75.1 (33.8 to 96.8, p
= 0.01) and 73.6 (18.8 to 100, p = 0.02) at final follow-up, respectively.
Linear regression analysis demonstrated a significant association
between poorer outcome scores and increased time to surgery following SCFE
(p <
0.05 for all parameters except baseline MHHS). Symptomatic FAI following (SCFE) may be addressed using arthroscopic
techniques, and should be treated promptly to minimise progressive
functional impairment and chondrolabral degeneration. Take home message: Arthroscopy of the hip can be used to treat
femoroacetabular impingement successfully following SCFE. However,
this should be performed promptly after presentation in order to
prevent irreversible progression and poorer clinical outcomes. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to determine patient-reported
outcomes of patients with mild to moderate developmental dysplasia
of the hip (DDH) and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) undergoing
arthroscopy of the hip in the treatment of chondrolabral pathology.
A total of 28 patients with a centre-edge angle between 15° and
19° were identified from an institutional database. Their mean age
was 34 years (18 to 53), with 12 female and 16 male patients. All
underwent labral treatment and concomitant correction of FAI. There
were nine reoperations, with two patients requiring revision arthroscopy,
two requiring periacetabular osteotomy and five needing total hip arthroplasty. Patients who required further major surgery were more likely
to be older, male, and to have more severe DDH with a larger alpha
angle and decreased joint space. At a mean follow-up of 42 months (24 to 89), the mean modified
Harris hip score improved from 59 (20 to 98) to 82 (45 to 100; p
<
0.001). The mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities
Osteoarthritis Index score improved from 30 (1 to 61) to 16 (0 to
43; p <
0.001). Median patient satisfaction was 9.0/10 (1 to
10). Patients reported excellent improvement in function following
arthroscopy of the hip. This study shows that with proper patient selection, arthroscopy
of the hip can be successful in the young patient with mild to moderate
DDH and FAI. Cite this article:
We report patient-reported outcomes and complications
associated with contemporary periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery
in treating symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and compare these outcomes
with total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with similar demographic
details. Two consecutive cohorts included patients between aged
18 to 40 years who had undergone either PAO (100 hips; 24 male,
76 female) or THA (55 hips; 18 male, 37 female). At a mean follow-up
of 5.9 years (2 to 13), there was significant improvement in the
modified Harris hip pain (p <
0.001, PAO and p <
0.001, THA),
function (p <
0.001, PAO and p = 0.001, THA), and total scores
(p <
0.001, PAO and p <
0.001, THA) within each cohort. There
were no significant differences in the clinical outcome scores between
the groups. Complication rates were low and similar in each cohort
(p = 0.68). Similar to THA, contemporary PAO surgery is a clinically
effective procedure that improves function and activity levels,
provides pain relief and is associated with an acceptable complication
rate. Cite this article:
We report the clinical and radiological outcome
of subcapital osteotomy of the femoral neck in the management of symptomatic
femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) resulting from a healed slipped
capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). We believe this is only the second
such study in the literature. We studied eight patients (eight hips) with symptomatic FAI after
a moderate to severe healed SCFE. There were six male and two female
patients, with a mean age of 17.8 years (13 to 29). All patients underwent a subcapital intracapsular osteotomy of
the femoral neck after surgical hip dislocation and creation of
an extended retinacular soft-tissue flap. The mean follow-up was
41 months (20 to 84). Clinical assessment included measurement of
range of movement, Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster
Universities Osteoarthritis score (WOMAC). Radiological assessment
included pre- and post-operative calculation of the anterior slip
angle (ASA) and lateral slip angle (LSA), the anterior offset angle
(AOA) and centre head–trochanteric distance (CTD). The mean HHS
at final follow-up was 92.5 (85 to 100), and the mean WOMAC scores
for pain, stiffness and function were 1.3 (0 to 4), 1.4 (0 to 6)
and 3.6 (0 to 19) respectively. There was a statistically significant
improvement in all the radiological measurements post-operatively.
The mean ASA improved from 36.6° (29° to 44°) to 10.3° (5° to 17°)
(p <
0.01). The mean LSA improved from 36.6° (31° to 43°) to 15.4°
(8° to 21°) (p <
0.01). The mean AOA decreased from 64.4° (50°
to 78°) 32.0° (25° to 39°) post-operatively (p <
0.01). The mean
CTD improved from -8.2 mm (-13.8 to +3.1) to +2.8 mm (-7.6 to +11.0)
(p <
0.01). Two patients underwent further surgery for nonunion.
No patient suffered avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Subcapital osteotomy for patients with a healed SCFE is more
challenging than subcapital re-orientation in those with an acute
or sub-acute SCFE and an open physis. An effective correction of
the deformity, however, can be achieved with relief of symptoms
related to impingement. Cite this article:
The treatment of hip dysplasia should be customised
for patients individually based on radiographic findings, patient
age, and the patient’s overall articular cartilage status. In many
patients, restoration of hip anatomy as close to normal as possible
with a PAO is the treatment of choice. Cite this article: