A lack of supporting clinical studies have been published to determine the ideal length of intramedullary nail in fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip. Nevertheless, there has been a trend to use shorter intramedullary nails for the internal fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. Our aim was to determine if the length of nail affected the outcome. We randomized 229 patients with a trochanteric hip fracture between two implants: a ‘standard’ nail of 220 mm and a shorter nail of 175 mm, which had decreased proximal angulation (4° vs 7°) and a reduced diameter at the level of the lesser trochanter. Patients were followed up for one year by a nurse blinded to the type of implant used to determine if there were differences in mobility and pain with two nail designs. Pain was assessed on a scale of 1 (none) to 8 (severe and constant) and mobility on a scale of 1 (full mobility) to 9 (immobile).Aims
Methods
The objective of this study was to investigate bone healing after
internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) with
the Dynamic Locking Blade Plate (DLBP) in a young patient population
treated by various orthopaedic (trauma) surgeons. We present a multicentre prospective case series with a follow-up
of one year. All patients aged ≤ 60 years with a displaced FNF treated
with the DLBP between 1st August 2010 and December 2014 were included.
Patients with pathological fractures, concomitant fractures of the
lower limb, symptomatic arthritis, local infection or inflammation,
inadequate local tissue coverage, or any mental or neuromuscular
disorder were excluded. Primary outcome measure was failure in fracture
healing due to nonunion, avascular necrosis, or implant failure
requiring revision surgery.Aims
Patients and Methods
To compare the outcomes for trochanteric fractures treated with
a sliding hip screw (SHS) or a cephalomedullary nail. A total of 400 patients with a trochanteric hip fracture were
randomised to receive a SHS or a cephalomedullary nail (Targon PFT).
All surviving patients were followed up to one year from injury.
Functional outcome was assessed by a research nurse blinded to the
implant used.Aims
Patients and Methods
This article is a systematic review of the published
literature about the biomechanics, functional outcome and complications
of intramedullary nailing of fractures of the distal radius. We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases and included all
studies which reported the outcome of intramedullary (IM) nailing
of fractures of the distal radius. Data about functional outcome,
range of movement (ROM), strength and complications, were extracted.
The studies included were appraised independently by both authors
using a validated quality assessment scale for non-controlled studies
and the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The search strategy revealed 785 studies, of which 16 were included
for full paper review. These included three biomechanical studies,
eight case series and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The biomechanical studies concluded that IM nails were at least
as strong as locking plates. The clinical studies reported that
IM nailing gave a comparable ROM, functional outcome and grip strength
to other fixation techniques. However, the mean complication rate of intramedullary nailing
was 17.6% (0% to 50%). This is higher than the rates reported in
contemporary studies for volar plating. It raises concerns about
the role of intramedullary nailing, particularly when comparative
studies have failed to show that it has any major advantage over
other techniques. Further adequately powered RCTs comparing the
technique to both volar plating and percutaneous wire fixation are needed. Cite this article:
A total of 56 male patients with a displaced
intracapsular fracture of the hip and a mean age of 81 years (62
to 94), were randomised to be treated with either a cemented hemiarthroplasty
(the Exeter Trauma Stem) or reduction and internal fixation using
the
We compared a new fixation system, the Targon
Femoral Neck (TFN) hip screw, with the current standard treatment of
cannulated screw fixation. This was a single-centre, participant-blinded,
randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 65 years and over with
either a displaced or undisplaced intracapsular fracture of the
hip were eligible. The primary outcome was the risk of revision
surgery within one year of fixation. A total of 174 participants were included in the trial. The absolute
reduction in risk of revision was of 4.7% (95% CI 14.2 to 22.5)
in favour of the TFN hip screw (chi-squared test, p = 0.741), which
was less than the pre-specified level of minimum clinically important
difference. There were no significant differences in any of the
secondary outcome measures. We found no evidence of a clinical difference in the risk of
revision surgery between the TFN hip screw and cannulated screw
fixation for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip. Cite this article:
A consecutive series of 320 patients with an
intracapsular fracture of the hip treated with a dynamic locking
plate (Targon Femoral Neck (TFN)) were reviewed. All surviving patients
were followed for a minimum of two years. During the follow-up period
109 patients died. There were 112 undisplaced fractures, of which three (2.7%) developed
nonunion or re-displacement and five (4.5%) developed avascular
necrosis of the femoral head. Revision to an arthroplasty was required
for five patients (4.5%). A further six patients (5.4%) had elective
removal of the plate and screws. There were 208 displaced fractures, of which 32 (15.4%) developed
nonunion or re-displacement and 23 (11.1%) developed avascular necrosis.
A further four patients (1.9%) developed a secondary fracture around
the TFN. Revision to a hip replacement was required for 43 patients
(20.7%) patients and a further seven (3.3%) had elective removal
of the plate and screws. It is suggested that the stronger distal fixation combined with
rotational stability may lead to a reduced incidence of complications
related to the healing of the fracture when compared with other
contemporary fixation devices but this needs to be confirmed in
further studies. Cite this article:
In a randomised trial involving 598 patients
with 600 trochanteric fractures of the hip, the fractures were treated with
either a sliding hip screw (n = 300) or a
