The aim of the study was to compare two methods of calculating pelvic incidence (PI) and pelvic tilt (PT), either by using the femoral heads or acetabular domes to determine the bicoxofemoral axis, in patients with unilateral or bilateral primary hip osteoarthritis (OA). PI and PT were measured on standing lateral radiographs of the spine in two groups: 50 patients with unilateral (Group I) and 50 patients with bilateral hip OA (Group II), using the femoral heads or acetabular domes to define the bicoxofemoral axis. Agreement between the methods was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEm). The intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the two methods were analyzed on 31 radiographs in both groups to calculate ICC and SEm.Aims
Methods
We aimed to determine quality of life and burnout
among Dutch orthopaedic trainees following a modern orthopaedic
curriculum, with strict compliance to a 48-hour working week. We
also evaluated the effect of the clinical climate of learning on
their emotional well-being. We assessed burnout, quality of life and the clinical climate
of learning in 105 orthopaedic trainees using the Maslach Burnout
Inventory, linear analogue scale self-assessments, and Dutch Residency
Educational Climate Test (D-RECT), respectively. A total of 19 trainees (18%) had poor quality of life and 49
(47%) were dissatisfied with the balance between their personal
and professional life. Some symptoms of burnout were found in 29
trainees (28%). Higher D-RECT scores (indicating a better climate
of learning) were associated with a better quality of life (r =
0.31, p = 0.001), more work-life balance satisfaction (r = 0.31,
p = 0.002), fewer symptoms of emotional exhaustion (r = -0.21, p = 0.028)
and depersonalisation (r = -0,28, p = 0.04). A reduced quality of life with evidence of burnout were still
seen in a significant proportion of orthopaedic trainees despite
following a modern curriculum with strict compliance to a 48-hour
working week. It is vital that further work is undertaken to improve
the quality of life and reduce burnout in this cohort. Cite this article:
The use of journal clubs and, more recently,
case-based discussions in order to stimulate debate among orthopaedic
surgeons lies at the heart of orthopaedic training and education. A
virtual learning environment can be used as a platform to host virtual
journal clubs and case-based discussions. This has many advantages
in the current climate of constrained time and diminishing trainee
and consultant participation in such activities. The virtual environment
model opens up participation and improves access to journal clubs
and case-based discussions, provides reusable educational content,
establishes an electronic record of participation for individuals,
makes use of multimedia material (including clinical imaging and
photographs) for discussion, and finally, allows participants to
link case-based discussions with relevant papers in the journal
club. The Leicester experience highlights the many advantages and some
of the potential difficulties in setting up such a virtual system
and provides useful guidance for those considering such a system
in their own training programme. As a result of the virtual learning
environment, trainee participation has increased and there is a
trend for increased consultant input in the virtual journal club
and case-based discussions. It is likely that the use of virtual environments will expand
to encompass newer technological approaches to personal learning
and professional development.
The
The aim of this study was to determine whether the foundation programme for junior doctors, implemented across the United Kingdom in 2005, provides adequate training in musculoskeletal medicine. We recruited 112 doctors on completion of their foundation programme and assessed them using the Freedman and Bernstein musculoskeletal examination tool. Only 8.9% passed the assessment. Those with exposure to orthopaedics, with a career interest in orthopaedics, and who felt that they had gained adequate exposure to musculoskeletal medicine obtained significantly higher scores. Those interested in general practice as a career obtained significantly lower scores. Only 15% had any exposure to orthopaedics during the foundation programme and only 13% felt they had adequate exposure to musculoskeletal medicine. The foundation programme currently provides inadequate training in musculoskeletal medicine. The quality and quantity of exposure to musculoskeletal medicine during the foundation programme must be improved.
