Single-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is gaining popularity in treating chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We have introduced this approach to our clinical practice and sought to evaluate rates of reinfection and re-revision, along with predictors of failure of both single- and two-stage rTKA for chronic PJI. A retrospective comparative cohort study of all rTKAs for chronic PJI between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2018 was undertaken using prospective databases. Patients with acute infections were excluded; rTKAs were classified as single-stage, stage 1, or stage 2 of two-stage revision. The primary outcome measure was failure to eradicate or recurrent infection. Variables evaluated for failure by regression analysis included age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, infecting organisms, and the presence of a sinus. Patient survivorship was also compared between the groups.Aims
Methods
Stemmed tibial components are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, overall pain, and diaphyseal tibial pain in patients who underwent revision TKA with cemented or uncemented stemmed tibial components. This is a retrospective cohort study involving 110 patients with revision TKA with cemented versus uncemented stemmed tibial components. Patients who underwent revision TKA with stemmed tibial components over a 15-year period at a single institution with at least two-year follow-up were assessed. Pain was evaluated through postal surveys. There were 63 patients with cemented tibial stems and 47 with uncemented stems. Radiographs and Knee Society Scores were used to evaluate for objective findings associated with pain or patient dissatisfaction. Postal surveys were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and the independent-samples Aims
Methods
Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) remains one option for the treatment of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) despite imperfect success rates. Intraosseous (IO) administration of vancomycin results in significantly increased local bone and tissue concentrations compared to systemic antibiotics alone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the addition of a single dose of IO regional antibiotics to our protocol at the time of DAIR would improve outcomes. A retrospective case series of 35 PJI TKA patients, with a median age of 67 years (interquartile range (IQR) 61 to 75), who underwent DAIR combined with IO vancomycin (500 mg), was performed with minimum 12 months' follow-up. A total of 26 patients with primary implants were treated for acute perioperative or acute haematogenous infections. Additionally, nine patients were treated for chronic infections with components that were considered unresectable. Primary outcome was defined by no reoperations for infection, nor clinical signs or symptoms of PJI.Aims
Methods
Aims. Enhanced perioperative protocols have significantly improved patient recovery following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Little has been investigated the effectiveness of these protocols for revision TKA (RTKA). We report on a matched group of aseptic revision and primary TKA patients treated with an identical pain and rehabilitation programmes. Methods. Overall, 40 aseptic full-component RTKA patients were matched (surgical date, age, sex, and body mass index (BMI)) to a group of primary cemented TKA patients. All RTKAs had new uncemented stemmed femoral and tibial components with
Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is a frequent cause of failure in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management options include an isolated tibial revision or full component revision. A full component revision is frequently selected by surgeons unfamiliar with the existing implant or who simply wish to “start again”. This option adds morbidity compared with an isolated tibial revision. While isolated tibial revision has a lower morbidity, it is technically more challenging due to difficulties with exposure and maintaining prosthetic stability. This study was designed to compare these two reconstructive options. Patients undergoing revision TKA for isolated aseptic tibial loosening between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Those with revision implants or revised for infection, instability, osteolysis, or femoral component loosening were excluded. A total of 164 patients were included; 88 had an isolated tibial revision and 76 had revision of both components despite only having a loose tibial component. The demographics and clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded.Aims
Methods
Metaphyseal fixation during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, but potentially difficult when using historical designs of cone. Material and manufacturing innovations have improved the size and shape of the cones which are available, and simplified the required bone preparation. In a large series, we assessed the implant survivorship, radiological results, and clinical outcomes of new porous 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones featuring a reamer-based system. We reviewed 142 revision TKAs in 139 patients using 202 cones (134 tibial, 68 femoral) which were undertaken between 2015 and 2016. A total of 60 involved tibial and femoral cones. Most cones (149 of 202; 74%) were used for Type 2B or 3 bone loss. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (44 to 88), and 76 (55 %) were female. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 34 kg/m2 (18 to 60). The patients had a mean of 2.4 (1 to 8) previous operations on the knee, and 68 (48%) had a history of prosthetic infection. The mean follow-up was 2.4 years (2 to 3.6).Aims
Methods
The treatment of bone loss in revision total
knee arthroplasty has evolved over the past decade. While the management
of small to moderate sized defects has demonstrated good results
with a variety of traditional techniques (cement and screws, small
metal augments, impaction bone grafting or modular stems), the treatment of
severe defects continues to be problematic. The use of a structural
allograft has declined in recent years due to an increased failure
rate with long-term follow-up and with the introduction of highly
porous metal augments that emphasise biological metaphyseal fixation.
Recently published mid-term results on the use of tantalum cones
in patients with severe bone loss has reaffirmed the success of
this treatment strategy. Cite this article:
Revision knee arthroplasty presents a number
of challenges, not least of which is obtaining solid primary fixation
of implants into host bone. Three anatomical zones exist within
both femur and tibia which can be used to support revision implants.
These consist of the joint surface or epiphysis, the metaphysis
and the diaphysis. The methods by which fixation in each zone can
be obtained are discussed. The authors suggest that solid fixation
should be obtained in at least two of the three zones and emphasise
the importance of pre-operative planning and implant selection. Cite this article:
We report on 397 consecutive revision total hip
replacements in 371 patients with a mean clinical and radiological follow-up
of 12.9 years (10 to 17.7). The mean age at surgery was 69 years
(37 to 93). A total of 28 patients (8%) underwent further revision,
including 16 (4%) femoral components. In all 223 patients (56%,
233 hips) died without further revision and 20 patients (5%, 20
hips) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining patients, 209 (221
hips) were available for clinical assessment and 194 (205 hips)
for radiological review at mean follow-up of 12.9 years (10 to 17.7). The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 58.7 (11 to 92) points
to 80.7 (21 to 100) (p <
0.001) and the mean Merle d’Aubigné and
Postel hip scores at final follow-up were 4.9 (2 to 6), 4.5 (2 to
6) and 4.3 (2 to 6), respectively for pain, mobility and function.
Radiographs showed no lucencies around 186 (90.7%) femoral stems
with stable bony ingrowth seen in 199 stems (97%). The survival
of the S-ROM femoral stem at 15 years with revision for any reason as
the endpoint was 90.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7 to 93.8)
and with revision for aseptic loosening as the endpoint 99.3% (95%
CI 97.2 to 99.8). We have shown excellent long-term survivorship and good clinical
outcome of a cementless hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular
femoral stem in revision hip surgery. Cite this article:
Bone loss in the proximal tibia and distal femur
is frequently encountered in revision knee replacement surgery.
The various options for dealing with this depend on the extent of
any bone loss. We present our results with the use of cementless
metaphyseal metal sleeves in 103 patients (104 knees) with a mean
follow-up of 43 months (30 to 65). At final follow-up, sleeves in
102 knees had good osseointegration. Two tibial sleeves were revised
for loosening, possibly due to infection. The average pre-operative Oxford Knee Score was 23 (11 to 36)
and this improved to 32 (15 to 46) post-operatively. These early
results encourage us to continue with the technique and monitor
the outcomes in the long term. Cite this article:
Most problems encountered in complex revision
total knee arthroplasty can be managed with the wide range of implant
systems currently available. Modular
Stems improve the mechanical stability of tibial
components in total knee replacement (TKR), but come at a cost of stress
shielding along their length. Their advantages include resistance
to shear, reduced tibial lift-off and increased stability by reducing
micromotion. Longer stems may have disadvantages including stress
shielding along the length of the stem with associated reduction
in bone density and a theoretical risk of subsidence and loosening, peri-prosthetic
fracture and end-of-stem pain. These features make long stems unattractive
in the primary TKR setting, but often desirable in revision surgery
with bone loss and instability. In the revision scenario, stems
are beneficial in order to convey structural stability to the construct
and protect the reconstruction of bony defects. Cemented and uncemented
long stemmed implants have different roles depending on the nature
of the bone loss involved. This review discusses the biomechanics of the design of tibial
components and stems to inform the selection of the component and
the technique of implantation.
