Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 11 of 11
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 5 - 16
1 Apr 2021
Coco V Shivji F Thompson P Grassi A Zaffagnini S Spalding T


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 2 | Pages 33 - 37
1 Apr 2020


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 3 - 8
1 Dec 2019
Pulido PG Donell S McNamara I


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 3 - 7
1 Jun 2019
Patel NG Waterson HB Phillips JRA Toms AD


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 13 - 16
1 Jun 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 3 | Pages 34 - 36
1 Jun 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 2 | Pages 40 - 42
1 Apr 2018
Foy MA


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 2 | Pages 15 - 18
1 Apr 2018


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 6 | Pages 35 - 36
1 Dec 2014
Das A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 20 - 23
1 Jun 2013

The June 2013 Knee Roundup360 looks at: knee arthroplasty in diabetic patients; whether TKR is a timebomb; the use of antidepressants for knee OA; trochleoplasty; articulated spacers; mental health and joint replacement; and the use of physiotherapy for meniscal tear.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 3 | Pages 9 - 13
1 Jun 2014
Waterson HB Philips JRA Mandalia VI Toms AD

Mechanical alignment has been a fundamental tenet of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) since modern knee replacement surgery was developed in the 1970s. The objective of mechanical alignment was to infer the greatest biomechanical advantage to the implant to prevent early loosening and failure. Over the last 40 years a great deal of innovation in TKA technology has been focusing on how to more accurately achieve mechanical alignment. Recently the concept of mechanical alignment has been challenged, and other alignment philosophies are being explored with the intention of trying to improve patient outcomes following TKA.

This article examines the evolution of the mechanical alignment concept and whether there are any viable alternatives.