Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_20 | Pages 74 - 74
1 Dec 2017
Murphy WS Kowal JH Hayden B Yun HH Murphy SB
Full Access

Introduction

Cup malpositioning remains a common cause of dislocation, wear, osteolysis, and revision. The concept of a “Safe Zone” for acetabular component orientation was introduced more than 35 years ago1. The current study assesses CT studies of replaced hips to assess the concept of a safe zone for acetabular orientation by comparing the orientation of acetabular components revised due to recurrent instability and to a series of stable hip replacements.

Methods

Cup orientation in 50 hips revised for recurrent instability was measured using CT. These hips were compared to a group of 184 stable hips measured using the same methods. Femoral anteversion in the stable hips was also measured.

Images to assess femoral anteversion in the unstable group were not available. An application specific software modules was developed to measure cup orientation using CT (HipSextant Research Application 1.0.13 Surgical Planning Associates Inc., Boston, Massachusetts). The cup orientation was determined by first identifying Anterior Pelvic Plane Coordinate system landmarks on a 3D surface model. A multiplanar reconstruction module then allowed for the creation of a plane parallel with the opening plane of the acetabulum. The orientation of the cup opening plane in the AP Plane coordinate space was calculated according to Murray's definitions of operative anteversion and operative inclination2. Both absolute cup position relative to the APP and tilt-adjusted cup position3 were calculated.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 35 - 35
1 Jan 2016
Shon WY Yun HH Suh DH
Full Access

The PowerPoint (2007 Version; Microsoft, Redmond, Wash) method is reported to have improved repeatability and reproducibility and is better able to detect differences in radiographs than previously established manual wear measurement methods. In this study, the PowerPoint method and the Dorr and Wan method were used to calculate the polyethylene liner wear volume. The wear volumes of retrieved polyethylene liners calculated from the 3D laser scanning method were compared with each method. This study hypothesized that the wear volume calculated by the PowerPoint method would correlate well with the wear volume measured by 3D laser scanning method.

Between March 2004 and June 2009, 22 polyethylene liners from 20 patients were collected during revision Total hip arthroplasty(THA). Exclusion criteria included (1) missing an early primary postoperative radiograph or prerevision radiograph, (2) evidence of acetabular loosening or migration, (3) existence of significant mismatch between early primary postoperative radiograph and prerevision radiographs on vertical axis, and (4) liner wear-through. After applying these exclusion criteria, 17 retrieved polyethylene liners from 16 patients were included in this study. Wear volumes were calculated using the PowerPoint, the Dorr and Wan methods by 3 independent experienced observers who were unaware of the study design, and 3-dimensional (3D) laser scanning methods.

Spearman correlation coefficients for wear volume results indicated strong correlations between the PowerPoint and 3D laser scanning methods (range, 0.89–0.93). On the other hand, Spearman correlation analysis revealed only moderate correlations between the Dorr and Wan and 3D laser scanning methods (range, 0.67–0.77).

The PowerPoint method is an efficient tool for the sequential radiologic follow-up of patients after THA. The PowerPoint method can be used to monitor linear wear after THA and could serve as an alternative method when computerized methods are not available.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 16 - 16
1 Jan 2016
Suh DH Han S Yun HH Shon WY
Full Access

A retrospective analysis of 63 primary total hip arthroplasty cases was done using repeated computed tomography scans to evaluate the pelvic osteolytic lesions in early stage. The progression rate of osteolysis of hips with small osteolytic volume less than 766.97 mm(3) in initial CT was 85.82 mm(3)/year, and that of hips with osteolysis more than 766.97 mm(3) was 456.3 mm(3)/year (P < 0.001). Younger patients less than 52 years old with good Harris Hip Scores (more than 80) frequently showed much faster progression in volume of osteolytic lesions. The rate of osteolysis was accelerated when the amount of osteolysis reached a certain threshold volume in active young patients in a cascade manner even in early stage.